2013
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Electronic Word-of-Mouth Effects on Online Discussion Forums: The Role of Perceived Positive Electronic Word-of-Mouth Review Credibility

Abstract: Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) has been an important factor influencing consumer purchase decisions. Using the ABC model of attitude, this study proposes a model to explain how eWOM affects online discussion forums. Specifically, we propose that platform (Web site reputation and source credibility) and customer (obtaining buying-related information and social orientation through information) factors influence purchase intentions via perceived positive eWOM review credibility, as well as product and Web site a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers also show that WOM valence, incidence, involvement and prior knowledge moderate the WOM effects (de Matos & Rossi, 2008;Doh & Hwang, 2009). In a related vein, researchers have identified factors (e.g., source trustworthiness, experience, expertise and evidence) that influence WOM adoption (Martin & Lueg, 2013) and WOM review credibility (Chih, Wang, Hsu, & Huang, 2013). It should be noted that the first two streams of research are from the WOM speaker's perspective while the latter stream is from the WOM listener's perspective.…”
Section: Virtual Communities and The Ripple Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other researchers also show that WOM valence, incidence, involvement and prior knowledge moderate the WOM effects (de Matos & Rossi, 2008;Doh & Hwang, 2009). In a related vein, researchers have identified factors (e.g., source trustworthiness, experience, expertise and evidence) that influence WOM adoption (Martin & Lueg, 2013) and WOM review credibility (Chih, Wang, Hsu, & Huang, 2013). It should be noted that the first two streams of research are from the WOM speaker's perspective while the latter stream is from the WOM listener's perspective.…”
Section: Virtual Communities and The Ripple Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The more known and reputable a website is, the more people will accept it (Park & Lee, 2009). Chih et al (2013) demonstrate that website reputation has a decisive influence on the credibility of online reviews. Hypothesis 8 (H8): Website reputation positively influences the credibility of an online review.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The reputation of a website depends heavily on its popularity and integrity. The more known and reputable a website is, the more people will accept it (Park & Lee, 2009b) and that the latter often rely on reputations when assessing the credibility of presented information (Chih et al, 2013). According to Chang and Chen (2008) Website image is defined instead as, the perceptions about a website name as reflected by the website associations held in customer memory.…”
Section: Website Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the message is online health information (Hu and Sundar, 2010), news stories (Xu, 2013), online travel recommendations (Ayeh, Au, Law, 2013), or brand attitudes in e-commerce (Chih, Wang, Hsu & Huang, 2013); source credibility appears to have a significant impact on information influence and on persuasion (Sussman and Siegal, 2003). Source credibility is a necessary factor when selecting information (Xu, 2013), it determines whether users would believe the story and be engaged in it.…”
Section: Source Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%