A 3M A3700 diamond disk was used to condition a Cabot Microelectronics Corporation D100 pad for 30 hours, and wear on its aggressive diamonds was analyzed. The top 20 aggressive diamonds for two perpendicular disk orientations were identified before wafer polishing, as well as after 15-hour and 30-hour polishing. Results showed that the original top 20 aggressive diamonds identified before polishing were subjected to wear after the first 15-hour polishing as the furrow surface area that they generated decreased dramatically by 47%. As these original aggressive diamonds were worn, seven new aggressive diamonds were "born" and joined the new top 20 list for both disk orientations. After the second 15-hour wafer polishing, the furrow surface area of these new top 20 aggressive diamonds did not change significantly. The furrow surface area created by all the active diamonds exhibited the same trend as the top 20 aggressive diamonds, confirming that most pad conditioning work was performed by these aggressive diamonds and that the disk lost its aggressiveness in the first 15 hours of polishing and then maintained its aggressiveness during the second 15 hours.Chemical and mechanical planarization (CMP) has been widely employed in the integrated circuit manufacturing industry to achieve local and global surface planarity. It is well known that diamond disks are commonly used for pad conditioning to prevent removal rate decay during CMP as the embedded diamonds cut across the pad surface under an applied load to regenerate pad asperities and remove used slurry and pad debris. 1-3 During pad conditioning, pad asperities and slurry abrasives make mechanical contact with the diamonds causing the diamonds to wear, 3 leading to the loss of disk effectiveness. A conventional diamond disk is typically replaced after dozens of hours of use. 4 Therefore, it is important to investigate diamond wear and loss of disk efficiency. There have been a few studies on diamond wear during CMP. For example, Liao 5 found that peripheral diamonds and the diamonds that originally protrude more highly with crest lines oriented upward wear faster. Borucki et al. 6,7 demonstrated that for a conventional diamond disk, typically less than 1 percent of the embedded diamonds (called active diamonds) create cutting furrows on the pad surface during pad conditioning. Other diamonds (referred as inactive diamonds) are not involved in pad cutting. Among the active diamonds, typically only 10 to 20 diamonds (named as aggressive diamonds) do the majority of the cutting and are therefore most susceptible to fracture or being pulled out. In a recent study, Meled et al. 3 conducted 24-hour wear tests using three types of diamond disks. Results showed the presence of micro-wear on the aggressive diamonds and no appreciable wear on the inactive diamonds. While diamond wear has been characterized to some extent, several questions remain unanswered. For example, do new aggressive diamonds appear as the original aggressive diamonds wear? How do these new aggressi...