2022
DOI: 10.1177/1071181322661132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Cyber Attacker Team Cognition

Abstract: Cyber attackers commonly operate in teams, which may process information collectively and thus, may be best understood when the team is treated as the unit of analysis. Future research in Oppositional Human Factors (OHF) should consider the impact of team-influencing and team-level biases and the impact that defensive interventions have on team cognition in general. Existing measurement approaches using team interactions may be well suited for studying red teams, and how OHF interventions impact cyber attacker… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While decision-making is a promising way of disrupting attackers, interactions with machines are by no means the only place CB may be present. The choices of confirmation bias and framing effects in general limited our examination of biases in decision-making, despite the existence of other cyber-relevant biases at large (Johnson et al, 2020; Johnson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While decision-making is a promising way of disrupting attackers, interactions with machines are by no means the only place CB may be present. The choices of confirmation bias and framing effects in general limited our examination of biases in decision-making, despite the existence of other cyber-relevant biases at large (Johnson et al, 2020; Johnson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One strategy toward mitigating this asymmetric advantage is a scientific one - by studying potential attackers within a human factors and behavioral psychology framework (e.g., Gutzwiller et al, 2015; Gutzwiller et al, 2018; and see Johnson et al, 2022 for a team disruption view). The goals of this interdisciplinary research in decision-making, computer, and psychological science, are to better understand attackers and defenders in terms of their cognitive limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%