2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2016.7757405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating current approaches to assessing teaching evaluation in engineering departments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It does not take into account the participation of students in the teaching process, and pays insufficient attention to the teacher-student interaction in the actual teaching process and the learning situation of students. It is a partial static evaluation [3][4][5]. The evaluation method is relatively single, and the evaluation model is outdated and rigid.…”
Section: The Problem Of Single and Rigid Evaluation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It does not take into account the participation of students in the teaching process, and pays insufficient attention to the teacher-student interaction in the actual teaching process and the learning situation of students. It is a partial static evaluation [3][4][5]. The evaluation method is relatively single, and the evaluation model is outdated and rigid.…”
Section: The Problem Of Single and Rigid Evaluation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult for students to grasp and score, which leads to students' inactivity and teachers' disapproval. Most teachers do not know the students' specific learning experience and learning gains, resulting in no continuous improvement [3].…”
Section: The Problem Of Poor Applicability Of Evaluation Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lecturer-to-lecturer evaluation is a means of obtaining accurate information about a colleague based on the fact that an evaluation from someone with experience in the same field and who knows the lecturer's work, ethic, and behavior would result in an ultimately more useful and accurate evaluation. This also has the potential to develop lecturers' working practices and help them understand the points of view of their colleagues [14][15][16].…”
Section: Peer-teaching Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure of assessment can be conducted using formative and/or summative approaches. In higher education, formative assessments of teaching are focused on providing instructors/professors with information that can help them to improve their teaching, as presented by (Pitterson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Selected Analysis Of the Icc Cb And Apc Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%