2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating bomb radiocarbon transport in the southern Pacific Ocean with otolith radiocarbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through 14 C assays of both the core and edge of the otoliths of deep-dwelling fish species, Horn et al (2010) were able to demonstrate that there was a delay of 10-15 years in the penetration of the 14 C signal to depths of 300-600 m in the south-west Pacific. Independent and more detailed otolith radiocarbon assays by Grammer et al (2015) documented a 5-10-year delay in radiocarbon penetration to a depth of 400-500 m in the Tasman Sea. In the north-east Atlantic, the D 14 C penetration depth increased by 1000 m over a period of 18 years (Nydal 1993); assuming a linear increase in depth through time, starting from the base of the 200-m mixed layer, this would imply that it would take 4.5 years for the signal to penetrate to the mean 450-m depth of the redfish in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through 14 C assays of both the core and edge of the otoliths of deep-dwelling fish species, Horn et al (2010) were able to demonstrate that there was a delay of 10-15 years in the penetration of the 14 C signal to depths of 300-600 m in the south-west Pacific. Independent and more detailed otolith radiocarbon assays by Grammer et al (2015) documented a 5-10-year delay in radiocarbon penetration to a depth of 400-500 m in the Tasman Sea. In the north-east Atlantic, the D 14 C penetration depth increased by 1000 m over a period of 18 years (Nydal 1993); assuming a linear increase in depth through time, starting from the base of the 200-m mixed layer, this would imply that it would take 4.5 years for the signal to penetrate to the mean 450-m depth of the redfish in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research involved the use of otolith for 14 C chronology (Piner and Wischniowski 2004; Alves et al 2015b), reservoir effect calculations (Kalish 1993; Alves et al 2015b; Milheira et al 2017; Macario et al 2018), isotope-derived paleotemperature (Thorrold et al 1997; Ghosh et al 2007; Darnaude et al 2014; Bertucci et al 2018), fish growing (Cook et al 2009; Andrews et al 2011), isotope fish migration signals (Holbach et al 2012; Darnaude et al 2014), environmental geochemistry (Albuquerque et al 2012; Stanley et al 2015) and palaeoceanography (Schloesser et al 2009; Grammer et al 2015). Following these works, we discuss the use of otolith for improving the accuracy in the 14 C dating of Brazilian shellmounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend has also been observed in long-lived sebastines in the north Pacific Ocean, Gulf of Alaska, and Bering Sea 41 , 79 , as well as other Helicolenus spp. in the western Pacific 40 . The offset between surface reference and otolith core Δ 14 C for species living at depths > 500 m is often reported to be 100–150‰, which is in the same range as the offset between nGOM blackbelly rosefish otolith core Δ 14 C and reference series Δ 14 C values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%