2018
DOI: 10.3390/nu10010105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Binge Eating Using Ecological Momentary Assessment: The Importance of an Appropriate Sampling Frequency

Abstract: With great interest, we read the recently published review on emotion regulation in binge eating disorder (BED) by Dingemans et al. [1].[...]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the time intervals in prior studies ranged between 1.33 (Houben et al, 2017) and 2 to 3 hr (e.g., Andrewes et al, 2017a), we used 1-hr intervals (i.e., the highest sampling frequency to date). We propose that high sampling-frequency assessments are more effective when investigating short-term antecedents of dysfunctional behaviors than the less frequent samplings used in previous studies (Kockler et al, 2018). Moreover, our result fits both patients' retrospective reports of antecedents of dysfunctional behaviors (Kleindienst et al, 2008) as well as theoretical assumptions (Hooley & Franklin, 2018;Linehan, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Whereas the time intervals in prior studies ranged between 1.33 (Houben et al, 2017) and 2 to 3 hr (e.g., Andrewes et al, 2017a), we used 1-hr intervals (i.e., the highest sampling frequency to date). We propose that high sampling-frequency assessments are more effective when investigating short-term antecedents of dysfunctional behaviors than the less frequent samplings used in previous studies (Kockler et al, 2018). Moreover, our result fits both patients' retrospective reports of antecedents of dysfunctional behaviors (Kleindienst et al, 2008) as well as theoretical assumptions (Hooley & Franklin, 2018;Linehan, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Further research is needed to understand if there is systematic bias in the types of eating episodes that are reported versus omitted in momentary studies of eating behavior, and to determine methods for improving response rates to signal-contingent recordings (e.g., providing immediate incentives such as credit towards online applications, rather than prorated incentives provided at the completion of the study). Indeed, future studies may benefit from employing more frequent daily assessments, while reducing the overall duration of the sampling period and the number of EMA items, in order to both address participant burden and understand the influence of rapidly changing constructs, such as affective state, on eating behavior (Kockler, Santangelo, & Ebner-Priemer, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seemingly simple choices in study design can have a major impact, for example (Kockler, Santangelo, & Ebner-Priemer, 2018). Most forms of analysis of EMA requires multi-level models that are still focused on the collective level of data in parsing out the means and variances of important study variables (Hedeker, Mermelstein, & Demirtas, 2012; for more comprehensive overviews of EMA methods, see Csikszentmihalyi & Larson, 1987, Stone & Shiffman, 1994, and Shiffman, Stone, & Hufford, 2008.…”
Section: Ecological Momentary Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%