2021
DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2021.1966202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating aggravating & mitigating factors considered by IIROC in penalty imposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Table 5, the F1score for all of the models ranges between 98% and 99%, which signi es that the models did a very good job predicting settlement cases. These ndings corroborate previous studies of IIROC's tendency to settle cases through settlement hearings (Lokanan & Masannagari, 2021;Wiesenfeld & Dove, 2011). Figure 4 presents the confusion matrix results for the classi ers used in this paper.…”
Section: Classi Cation Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Table 5, the F1score for all of the models ranges between 98% and 99%, which signi es that the models did a very good job predicting settlement cases. These ndings corroborate previous studies of IIROC's tendency to settle cases through settlement hearings (Lokanan & Masannagari, 2021;Wiesenfeld & Dove, 2011). Figure 4 presents the confusion matrix results for the classi ers used in this paper.…”
Section: Classi Cation Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…No speci c weight is given to any single factor, and in most cases, more than one mitigating and aggravating factor is involved. As can be seen in Table 2, an average of three mitigating and aggravating factors each were cited per case (see also Lokanan, 2014;Lokanan & Masannagari, 2021). Most importantly is that at least one aggravating factor was present in a case but was not considered to merit a harsher sentence.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%