“…In all other cases V incorporates to T=AUX. If this proposal is correct, Agreement has no independent effect on V-movement, irrespective of its relative position in relation to TP, so it is not represented in (55) (and see latridou 1989 for a criticism of the role of AGRP in Pollock's proposal, and Travis (1984) and adopted by Baker (1985,1988) and Chomsky (1986), which must be abandoned in favor of the ECP exclusively (Chomsky 1988, Ouhalla 1988, Lema and Rivero 1989a. This Situation raises two related issues requiring future research into the cross-linguistic properties of LHM: (a) how LHM constructions satisfy the ECP, and (b) the role of Relativized Minimality in Head Movement, an area where Rizzi thought (1989) the HMC was sufficient.…”