2012
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverted Alu dsRNA structures do not affect localization but can alter translation efficiency of human mRNAs independent of RNA editing

Abstract: With over one million copies, Alu elements are the most abundant repetitive elements in the human genome. When transcribed, interaction between two Alus that are in opposite orientation gives rise to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). Although the presence of dsRNA in the cell was previously thought to only occur during viral infection, it is now known that cells express many endogenous small dsRNAs, such as short interfering RNA (siRNAs) and microRNA (miRNAs), which regulate gene expression. It is possible that lon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(67 reference statements)
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conservation of Staufen1 in C. elegans, as well as many other SMD decay factors, suggests that turnover of mRNAs having dsRNA in their 3 ′ UTRs may also occur in C. elegans. Structured 3 ′ UTRs that are hyperedited by ADAR can be sequestered in nuclear paraspeckles (Zhang and Carmichael 2001) and, when not restricted to the nucleus, have reduced translatability (Hundley et al 2008;Capshew et al 2012). One or both of these mechanisms could act upon mRNAs with EERs in their 3 ′ UTRs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Eer Data Sets With Data Sets Of Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conservation of Staufen1 in C. elegans, as well as many other SMD decay factors, suggests that turnover of mRNAs having dsRNA in their 3 ′ UTRs may also occur in C. elegans. Structured 3 ′ UTRs that are hyperedited by ADAR can be sequestered in nuclear paraspeckles (Zhang and Carmichael 2001) and, when not restricted to the nucleus, have reduced translatability (Hundley et al 2008;Capshew et al 2012). One or both of these mechanisms could act upon mRNAs with EERs in their 3 ′ UTRs.…”
Section: Comparison Of Eer Data Sets With Data Sets Of Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6A). In addition, we identified two other components of ADARendoRNPs: Frgy2 (Ranjan et al 1993;Capshew et al 2012) and RAP55/Car-1 (Tanaka et al 2006), both of which associate with translationally repressed mRNAs in Xenopus oocytes, and the latter of which is also a component of P-bodies and stress granules in human cells (Fig. 6A).…”
Section: Adar Associates With Endogenous Xenopus Mrnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, this is the first report of ADAR's association with these proteins. In adult worms and human cells, ADAR does not affect the translation efficiency of RNAs containing structured 3 ′ UTRs, suggesting that ADAR's role in translational repression might be specific to early development or to X. laevis early development (Hundley et al 2008;Capshew et al 2012). An interesting question for future studies is whether all edited RNAs are incorporated into storage mRNPs in Xenopus oocytes.…”
Section: Adar-endornps: Adar-rnps Containing Endogenous Rnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis shows that nearly 300 human genes have highly edited IRAlus in their 3′-UTRs [68], indicating that perhaps more genes are regulated by nuclear retention. Additionally, studies have shown that some mRNAs with edited 3′-UTRs are present in the cytoplasm [70,71]. It appears that several mRNAs can escape from hyper-editinginduced nuclear retention.…”
Section: Editing In Utrsmentioning
confidence: 99%