2007
DOI: 10.1134/s002136400709010x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of the relative probabilities of the f-f and f-d transitions in the Ln3+ lanthanide ions at their radio- and sonoexcitation as compared to photoexcitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms the excitation of Gd 3+ under US (although the QY and consequently the excitation mechanism cannot be determined) and its significant quenching. The origin of the line reported by Sharipov et al remains unknown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This confirms the excitation of Gd 3+ under US (although the QY and consequently the excitation mechanism cannot be determined) and its significant quenching. The origin of the line reported by Sharipov et al remains unknown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…5 The second excitation pathway is by collisions with the "hot" particles generated during bubble collapse, 6 similarly to what happens under α-, β-, or X-ray irradiation. 7 In radiation chemistry, the impact generates excited water molecules that then transfer their energy to the lanthanide ions; alternatively, excited ions can also be produced by direct action of the radiation. 8 In sonochemistry, direct excitation by collision and transfer of kinetic and excitation energy from the "hot" particles occurs in the bubble or at its interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previously, the existence of Ce 3+ CE was not observed at studying MBSL of Ce 3+ [14] , [16] . Indeed, the contribution of this mechanism is small due to the low yield of Ce 3+ CE [30] (despite the movement of the bubbles and the deformation injection of the solution under conditions of multibubble sonolysis). Therefore, the contribution of CE is difficult to separate from the contribution of SPL mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%