SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1988 1988
DOI: 10.1190/1.1892168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of prestack field data: An application to 1‐D acoustic media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-linear acoustic inversion of real data for laterally invariant media have been reported by Hindlet and Kolb (1988) and by Pica, Diet and Tarantola (1990). Hindlet and Kolb (1988) used a finite-difference method to model the data. They estimated both reflectivity and velocity starting with a low-frequency inversion and then gradually increasing the bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non-linear acoustic inversion of real data for laterally invariant media have been reported by Hindlet and Kolb (1988) and by Pica, Diet and Tarantola (1990). Hindlet and Kolb (1988) used a finite-difference method to model the data. They estimated both reflectivity and velocity starting with a low-frequency inversion and then gradually increasing the bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…demonstrated on synthetic data that this difficulty could be overcome by starting the inversion with low-frequency data, followed by a step-wise increase of the frequency content. Hindlet and Kolb (1988) succeeded in applying this technique to real data, while Pica, Diet and Tarantola (1987) encountered some difficulties. These difficulties might be related to the poor signal-to-noise ratio often found in the low-frequency band of real data.…”
Section: Estimation Of T H E Earth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full-waveform inversion (FWI) using two-way wave equation obtains a velocity update by crosscorrelation between the state wavefield, which is similar to the source wavefield in RTM, and the adjoint wavefield (Tarantola, 1984;Hindlet and Kolb, 1988;Plessix, 2006). The adjoint wavefield is extrapolated from a data residual, which is often defined as the difference between observed and synthetic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%