1995
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(95)00092-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of oblique ionograms including the Earth's magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gething and Maliphant [] suggested a double‐step method in which an oblique ionogram is converted into a vertical and analyzed by means of inversion techniques developed for vertical ionograms. A further approach is to obtain the electron density profile directly from the oblique ionogram, as has been proposed by Phanivong et al []. This method takes into account the presence of the Earth's magnetic field and is based on the inversion technique developed by Reilly and Kolesar [], which considers the curvature of the ionosphere and handles the ambiguity related to the presence of the valley in the electron density profile.…”
Section: Automatic Scaling Of Oblique Ionogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gething and Maliphant [] suggested a double‐step method in which an oblique ionogram is converted into a vertical and analyzed by means of inversion techniques developed for vertical ionograms. A further approach is to obtain the electron density profile directly from the oblique ionogram, as has been proposed by Phanivong et al []. This method takes into account the presence of the Earth's magnetic field and is based on the inversion technique developed by Reilly and Kolesar [], which considers the curvature of the ionosphere and handles the ambiguity related to the presence of the valley in the electron density profile.…”
Section: Automatic Scaling Of Oblique Ionogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most run in near real time on the sounder system itself, applying a consistent set of conventions (Piggott & Rawer, ) to characterize the propagation characteristics and reduce the ionogram image to a parameterized representation. These automatic techniques generally fall into one of two main categories: Trace extraction or skeletonization, typically using a combination of morphological image operations, computer vision, and tracking algorithms (e.g., Chen et al, ; Galkin & Reinisch, ; Guiducci et al, ; Su et al, ; Zheng et al, ), followed by profile inversion (e.g., Huang & Reinisch, ; Phanivong et al, ; Reilly & Kolesar, ; Titheridge, ). A prominent example is the software package ARTIST (Galkin & Reinisch, ; Reinisch et al, ; Reinisch et al, ; Reinisch & Huang, ), developed for the Lowell Digisonde (Reinisch et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These automatic techniques generally fall into one of two main categories: 1. Trace extraction or skeletonization, typically using a combination of morphological image operations, computer vision, and tracking algorithms (e.g., Chen et al, 2013;Galkin & Reinisch, 2008;Guiducci et al, 1983;Su et al, 2012;Zheng et al, 2013), followed by profile inversion (e.g., Huang & Reinisch, 1982;Phanivong et al, 1995;Reilly & Kolesar, 1989;Titheridge, 1988). A prominent example is the software package ARTIST (Galkin & Reinisch, 2008;Reinisch et al, 1988;Reinisch et al, 2005;Reinisch & Huang, 1983), developed for the Lowell Digisonde (Reinisch et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Reilly and Kolesar (1989) improved the inversion method proposed by Reilly (1985) (known as the R-K method), it simultaneously solved the equations for group path delay and sounder range by using analytical method which was more accurate than the Breit-Tuve theorem. A technique which was a development of the work of Reilly and Kolesar was presented (Phaninong et al, 1995), it considered the effect of the Earth's magnetic field. An analysis of the inversion results with and without Earth's magnetic field found that the former was closer to the real values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%