Inversion of magnetic measurements of the CHAMP satellite over the Pannonian Basin

Kis, K.I.; Taylor, Patrick T.; Wittmann, G.; Toronyi, B.; Puszta, Sándor

doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.07.018

Cited by 9 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There was a problem with the back- crustal shields of Russia. The inversion procedures are discussed [5] and [6]. The Laplacian and Gaussian model parameter distributions and the effect of regularization are presented [5] [6] and [7] showed the calculation of horizontal gradients and their interpretation, [8] pointed out that the source of the global magnetic anomalies was in the lithosphere.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interpretation of the Magnetic Measurements of the Swarm-A Satellite over Central Europe

Pt¹,

Ki²,

Toronyi³

et al. 2019

Int J Astronaut Aeronautical Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our paper discusses the determination of total magnetic field anomalies derived from the Swarm-A satellite data; one of two low orbiting satellites of the three Swarm formations. This procedure requires several modifications. The first step is the conversion of the measured CDF data to the ASCII format. This step is followed for the selection of the data with K p index ≤ 1 +. The anomalies are determined by the removal of the IGRF from the resulting satellite data. There are two Swarm-A data sets descending (6000) orbits and ascending (5688) orbits. For our study the descending orbits were used. The calculations next step is to difference of the two-dimensional linear field Figure 3 fitted to the Swarm-A anomalies and the anomalies given in Figure 2. These anomalies are filtered by Gaussian low-pass filter. The last step of the corrections is the remove the direct component, zero spatial frequency, from the descending orbits. The anomalies and their vertical gradients are qualitatively interpreted over Central Europe and the Pannonian Basin.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interpretation of the Magnetic Measurements of the Swarm-A Satellite over Central Europe

Pt¹,

Ki²,

Toronyi³

et al. 2019

Int J Astronaut Aeronautical Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the Romanian region, the main magnetic contribution is associated with the Neogene-Quaternary volcanism beneath the Pannonian Basin (PN) (Boccaletti et al, 1976), a back-arc basin formed during the complex evolution of the Carpathians-Alpine system (Horváth, 1993). Following Kis et al (2011), in the Pannonian Basin xenolith and peridotite rocks formed in the deep crust-upper mantle and were carried up into the shallow crust.…”

Section: Magnetic Field At 5 Kmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint analysis of the magnetic field and total gradient intensity in central Europe

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. In the European region, the magnetic field at satellite altitudes (∼350 km) is mainly defined by a long-wavelength magnetic low, called the Central European Magnetic Low (CEML) here, located to the southwest of the Trans-European Suture Zone (TESZ). We studied this area through a joint analysis of magnetic and total gradient (∇T) anomaly maps for a range of different altitudes of 5, 100 and 350 km. Tests on synthetic models showed the usefulness of the joint analysis at various altitudes to identify reverse dipolar anomalies and to characterize areas in which magnetization is weak. This way we identified areas where either reversely or normally magnetized sources are locally dominant. At a European scale these anomalies are sparse, with a low degree of coalescence effect. The ∇T map indeed presents generally small values within the CEML area, indicating that the Paleozoic Platform is weakly magnetized. At 350 km of altitude, the TESZ effect is largely dominant: with intense ∇T highs above the East European Craton (EEC) and very small values above the Paleozoic Platform, this again denotes a weakly magnetized crust. Small coalescence effects are masked by the trend of the TESZ. Although we identified sparsely located reversely magnetized sources in the Paleozoic Platform of the CEML, the joint analysis does not support a model of a generally reversely magnetized crust. Instead, our analysis strongly favors the hypothesis that the CEML anomaly is mainly caused by a sharp contrast between the magnetic properties of the EEC and Paleozoic Platform.

show abstract

“…The 36 2 total magnetic field of the Earth was measured by a scalar Overhauser magnetometer with the 37 accuracy of ±0.5 nT. 38 We have previously interpreted CHAMP magnetic anomalies over several different 39 areas (Taylor et al 2003(Taylor et al , 2005(Taylor et al and 2008, Kis et al 2011). 40…”

Section: Introduction 28 29mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After the satellite data were reduced and plotted (Kis et al, 2011) we made a 45 quantitative interpretation using method of Kis et al (2011) with some modifications. Some 46 parts of the above mentioned phases have been published by Kis et al (2011).…”

Section: Introduction 28 29mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interpretation of the total magnetic field anomalies measured by the CHAMP satellite over a part of Europe and the Pannonian Basin

Kis¹,

Taylor²,

Wittmann³

et al. 2012

Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inversion of magnetic measurements of the CHAMP satellite over the Pannonian Basin

Cited by 9 publications

References 34 publications

Interpretation of the Magnetic Measurements of the Swarm-A Satellite over Central Europe

Interpretation of the Magnetic Measurements of the Swarm-A Satellite over Central Europe

Joint analysis of the magnetic field and total gradient intensity in central Europe

Interpretation of the total magnetic field anomalies measured by the CHAMP satellite over a part of Europe and the Pannonian Basin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About