SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1190/segam2016-13972845.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion of an anomaly due to multiple magnetizations: An example from the Coompana survey, South Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inversion model reproduces all of the major features of the observed anomaly, but not all of the detail. In particular there are several local features (some of which may possibly be feeder zones), but those require dedicated local inversions because they contribute such a small proportion of the anomaly that they are poorly constrained in a full-anomaly inversion (Foss et al, 2016). The gravity inversion model and the inner sheet of the magnetic field inversion model overlap quite closely, and the gravity anomaly can be well matched by assigning a suitable density to the inner sheet of the magnetic field inversion model.…”
Section: Anomaly Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inversion model reproduces all of the major features of the observed anomaly, but not all of the detail. In particular there are several local features (some of which may possibly be feeder zones), but those require dedicated local inversions because they contribute such a small proportion of the anomaly that they are poorly constrained in a full-anomaly inversion (Foss et al, 2016). The gravity inversion model and the inner sheet of the magnetic field inversion model overlap quite closely, and the gravity anomaly can be well matched by assigning a suitable density to the inner sheet of the magnetic field inversion model.…”
Section: Anomaly Cmentioning
confidence: 99%