1970
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(70)90059-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion layers in abrupt p-n junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The depletion layer approximation had been first criticized by Gummel and Scharfetter from calculations on p þ n step homojunctions where these authors showed that the intercept voltage in highly dissymmetric junctions is not as expected from the simple depletion approximation [28]. However only very few papers in the literature dealt with this inversion layer related problem [29][30][31], and to our best knowledge, no indication on the temperature dependence had been published. It is amazing that the peculiar temperature dependence could be evidenced from measurements on solar cells combining a-Si:H and c-Si since one could think that a-Si:H, as a very defective material could greatly influence the capacitance behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The depletion layer approximation had been first criticized by Gummel and Scharfetter from calculations on p þ n step homojunctions where these authors showed that the intercept voltage in highly dissymmetric junctions is not as expected from the simple depletion approximation [28]. However only very few papers in the literature dealt with this inversion layer related problem [29][30][31], and to our best knowledge, no indication on the temperature dependence had been published. It is amazing that the peculiar temperature dependence could be evidenced from measurements on solar cells combining a-Si:H and c-Si since one could think that a-Si:H, as a very defective material could greatly influence the capacitance behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If one neglects the holes' contribution to the charge density in Eq. (17), the function f is then reduced to f* that is independent of V a f à ðu e ðxÞÞ ¼ exp u e ðxÞ À exp u e ð1Þ þ exp u e ð1Þðu e ð1Þ À u e ðxÞÞ; (30) and the capacitance is obtained from Eq. (29) by following the same procedure as given above and substituting f by f*.…”
Section: B Full Analytical Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using (13a), ( l o b ) will be converted into an integral over energy qs, the rnagiiitude of which can be found by numerical integration. Considering also ( 7 ) . (8b), and (12b), (…”
Section: E ( X )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kennedy [ 131 presents different expressions for U , in the ranges 1 5 N , / N , 5 10 and N A / N , > 10. He compares exact numerical solutions with three analytical approxirnation formulas, the first obtained by himself, the second found by Guniniel and Scharfetter [ 5 ] , and the third presented by Van de Wiele and Demoulin [7]. The calculated maximum errors in the junction capacitance C amount to 130,; in the solution of [5], to 77;> in that of [7], and to 3.5';" in U , can be determined by comparison with (1) in dependence on the impurity densities N , and N,.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%