2024
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c13658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion for Thermal Properties with Frequency Domain Thermoreflectance

Benjamin Treweek,
Volkan Akcelik,
Wyatt Hodges
et al.

Abstract: 3D integration of multiple microelectronic devices improves size, weight, and power while increasing the number of interconnections between components. One integration method involves the use of metal bump bonds to connect devices and components on a common interposer platform. Significant variations in the coefficient of thermal expansion in such systems lead to stresses that can cause thermomechanical and electrical failures. More advanced characterization and failure analysis techniques are necessary to ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many recent studies have focused on the development of techniques to characterize the thermal resistance across interfaces that are 10s to 100s of μm below the surface of a material. Such interfaces are abundant in modern devices, including multilayer microelectronics packaging, , wide bandgap materials and devices, , power electronics architectures, ,, and memory storage systems, and are fast becoming the largest bottleneck to sufficient heat dissipation in the next generation of these applications. Critically, interfaces at these depths are extremely challenging to characterize using existing steady-state techniques, which are limited to spatial resolutions above several hundred μm’s, or with advanced optical pump–probe thermoreflectance techniques, which probe at depths that range between nm’s to single-digit μm below a sample surface. , Most recent techniques have relied on augmentations to existing thermoreflectance systems; for instance, several studies achieve larger thermal penetration depths by extending the range of modulation frequencies applied to the pump beam. In general, improvements in thermal penetration depth ( δ = 2 α / f ; α is thermal diffusivity, f is modulation frequency) have been limited to <10 μm due to spreading in the upper transducer layer …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent studies have focused on the development of techniques to characterize the thermal resistance across interfaces that are 10s to 100s of μm below the surface of a material. Such interfaces are abundant in modern devices, including multilayer microelectronics packaging, , wide bandgap materials and devices, , power electronics architectures, ,, and memory storage systems, and are fast becoming the largest bottleneck to sufficient heat dissipation in the next generation of these applications. Critically, interfaces at these depths are extremely challenging to characterize using existing steady-state techniques, which are limited to spatial resolutions above several hundred μm’s, or with advanced optical pump–probe thermoreflectance techniques, which probe at depths that range between nm’s to single-digit μm below a sample surface. , Most recent techniques have relied on augmentations to existing thermoreflectance systems; for instance, several studies achieve larger thermal penetration depths by extending the range of modulation frequencies applied to the pump beam. In general, improvements in thermal penetration depth ( δ = 2 α / f ; α is thermal diffusivity, f is modulation frequency) have been limited to <10 μm due to spreading in the upper transducer layer …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%