2022
DOI: 10.3390/land11050608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inversion Estimation of Soil Organic Matter in Songnen Plain Based on Multispectral Analysis

Abstract: Sentinel-2A multi-spectral remote sensing image data underwent high-efficiency differential processing to extract spectral information, which was then matched to soil organic matter (SOM) laboratory test values from field samples. From this, multiple-linear stepwise regression (MLSR) and partial least square (PLSR) models were established based on a differential algorithm for surface SOM modeling. The original spectra were subjected to basic transformations with first- and second-derivative processing. MLSR an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the RF model was more accurate than the PLS and GWR models in almost all cases, and the GWR model was more accurate than the PLS model (Tables S2 and 4). The accuracy of the optimal SOM estimation model (in the RF model that used the multitemporal images from 2018, R 2 val = 0.67, and RPIQval = 3.36) is basically consistent with the results of most previous studies [20,64]. Combined with previous studies [65,66], our study further confirms the advantages of the RF model for SOM estimation and that the RF model had significant differences in the methodological properties from the PLS and GWR models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, the RF model was more accurate than the PLS and GWR models in almost all cases, and the GWR model was more accurate than the PLS model (Tables S2 and 4). The accuracy of the optimal SOM estimation model (in the RF model that used the multitemporal images from 2018, R 2 val = 0.67, and RPIQval = 3.36) is basically consistent with the results of most previous studies [20,64]. Combined with previous studies [65,66], our study further confirms the advantages of the RF model for SOM estimation and that the RF model had significant differences in the methodological properties from the PLS and GWR models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, spatial variation of soil characteristics is greatly influenced by external factors, especially in soil fertility and quality [32][33][34]. Although the soil organic matter (SOM) content in soil is minimal, it is an indispensable part of the soil that provides various nutrients necessary for crop growth and development and is a key indicator for evaluating soil fertility [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many previous modeling experiments conducted using deep learning in the study of SOM content inversion from hyperspectral images [ 26 , 27 ]. However, the inversion of SOM content from a multispectral image has mostly been conducted by using statistical methods to model the individual features obtained from a single band or through a combination of multiple bands due to the small number of bands [ 28 ]. In this paper, we try to use the deep learning method to model the obtained spectral data, thereby achieving the inversion of SOM content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%