1988
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/4/1/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse scattering problem for a family of phase-equivalent nonlocal potentials

Abstract: General statement of the inverse scattering problem as applied to the Schrodinger equation with nonlocal potentials is proposed for a family of phase-equivalent nonlocal potentials. The main result is that the problem of reconstructing both the family of phase-equivalent wavefunctions and the corresponding family of phase-equivalent potentials is reduced to solving some regular (quadratically nonlinear) integral equation. It is shown that if the S-matrix Sl(k) is rational in k, then for a dense set of nonlocal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We just list these and refer the reader to the original papers. These methods are: an alternative quasi-classical scheme related to the eikonal (Glauber) model of scattering [19]; a finite difference method of Hooshyar and Razavy [20,21]; a polynomial scheme developed by Kermode et al [22]; a quite interesting general approach of R-matrix inversion due to Zakhariev and Suzko [23,24]; a method due to Muzafarov for finding a general non-local potential [25,26]; a new technique based on the dispersion relations for the current matrix elements (straightforwardly generalizable to the relativistic case) by Troitsky and others [27,28]; a numerical inversion method utilizing a continuous analogue of Newton's wellknown minimization method [29], the generalized Darboux transformation of Schnizer and Leeb [30]; a method due to Alam and Malik [31,32], and many others. The majority of these approaches have been tested or studied with a few examples only and still await wider application.…”
Section: A Survey Of Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We just list these and refer the reader to the original papers. These methods are: an alternative quasi-classical scheme related to the eikonal (Glauber) model of scattering [19]; a finite difference method of Hooshyar and Razavy [20,21]; a polynomial scheme developed by Kermode et al [22]; a quite interesting general approach of R-matrix inversion due to Zakhariev and Suzko [23,24]; a method due to Muzafarov for finding a general non-local potential [25,26]; a new technique based on the dispersion relations for the current matrix elements (straightforwardly generalizable to the relativistic case) by Troitsky and others [27,28]; a numerical inversion method utilizing a continuous analogue of Newton's wellknown minimization method [29], the generalized Darboux transformation of Schnizer and Leeb [30]; a method due to Alam and Malik [31,32], and many others. The majority of these approaches have been tested or studied with a few examples only and still await wider application.…”
Section: A Survey Of Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%