2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Saltykov analysis for particle-size distributions and their time evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the PDF cannot be computed without a regularization procedure, such as linear interpolation or smoothing (Anderssen and Jakeman, 1975). For instance, Jeppsson et al (2011) have used the so-called kernel density estimation to get a continuous description of the empirical PDF. In addition, the estimation of the expectation (E) is not straightforward.…”
Section: Aims Of This Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the PDF cannot be computed without a regularization procedure, such as linear interpolation or smoothing (Anderssen and Jakeman, 1975). For instance, Jeppsson et al (2011) have used the so-called kernel density estimation to get a continuous description of the empirical PDF. In addition, the estimation of the expectation (E) is not straightforward.…”
Section: Aims Of This Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any shape more complex than either an elongated or flattened spheroid with bivariate axes, there is no analytical solution to the stereological problem without imposing additional assumptions, such as the requirement of a specific size distribution of particles [16][17][18]. Since particle shapes in materials are neither necessarily uniform nor is the size distribution usually known, the assumption of spherical particles (or at least globally-convex particles which have the average shape of a sphere in rotation) remains common in materials science (e.g., [5,[19][20][21]). In the present work, the unfolding relationship for spheres is re-derived in terms of the histogram of observation areas as inputs (rather than radii or diameters) and a practical method is presented for utilizing the un-physical results that propagate during the calculation for the creation of error bars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He then used the empirical data and a histogram estimator to solve his particular problem. This basic stereological model has been applied in a variety of disciplines where it is not possible to obtain full 3D measurements of objects simply by looking at them; this includes biology, geology, astronomy and materials science: [Cruz-Orive and Weibel (1990), Giumelli, Militzer and Hawbolt (1999), Higgins (2000), Jeppsson et al (2011), Miyamoto (1994), Sahagian and Proussevitch (1998), Sen and Woodroofe (2012), Tewari and Gokhale (2001)]. Not surprisingly, the method has also gained considerable attention in the statistics literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%