2005
DOI: 10.1080/02786820500182289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Modeling of Aerosol Dynamics Using Adjoints: Theoretical and Numerical Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Henze et al (2004) and Sandu et al (2005b) used the adjoint method for inverse modeling of aerosol distributions in box model simulations. Hakami et al (2005) used the adjoint of STEM for inverse modeling of black carbon aerosol, treated as an inert tracer.…”
Section: Adjoint Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henze et al (2004) and Sandu et al (2005b) used the adjoint method for inverse modeling of aerosol distributions in box model simulations. Hakami et al (2005) used the adjoint of STEM for inverse modeling of black carbon aerosol, treated as an inert tracer.…”
Section: Adjoint Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing the concentration of nucleated particles and the time interval in which they formed gives the nucleation rate. This is different from other methods that are based on fitting the nucleation rate using an aerosol dynamics model (Lehtinen et al, 2004;Sandu et al, 2005) or on correcting the appearance rate for coagulation (O'Dowd et al, 1999;Kulmala et al, 2001;Kerminen and Kulmala, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of Hakami et al (2005) deals only with inert carbonaceous aerosols, and the work of Dubovik et al (2004), though global in scale, does not include full chemistry or aerosol thermodynamics. Detailed adjoint modeling of aerosols began with the theoretical investigations of Henze et al (2004) and Sandu et al (2005b). However, these are preliminary studies performed on idealized box model systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%