2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2012.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse modeling for estimating fluid-overpressure distributions and stress intensity factors from an arbitrary open-fracture geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equation applies strictly only to the maximum opening. However, many dykes show comparatively smooth flat-elliptical variations in their openings/displacements, in which case the maximum displacement is similar to the average displacement781415. The overpressure in the dyke at the surface is given by15 where p e is the fluid excess pressure in the source magma chamber, ρ r is the average density of the host rock, ρ m is the average density of the magma in the dyke, g is acceleration due to gravity, h is the depth to the source chamber, and σ d is the differential stress (the difference between the vertical stress and the minimum principal horizontal stress) at the surface where the volcanic fissure forms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This equation applies strictly only to the maximum opening. However, many dykes show comparatively smooth flat-elliptical variations in their openings/displacements, in which case the maximum displacement is similar to the average displacement781415. The overpressure in the dyke at the surface is given by15 where p e is the fluid excess pressure in the source magma chamber, ρ r is the average density of the host rock, ρ m is the average density of the magma in the dyke, g is acceleration due to gravity, h is the depth to the source chamber, and σ d is the differential stress (the difference between the vertical stress and the minimum principal horizontal stress) at the surface where the volcanic fissure forms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…the section on Methods below). The detailed variations in the aperture of a volcanic fissure/thickness of a feeder-dyke can be modelled using Fourier cosine series14 or polynomials15. Commonly, however, the detailed variation in aperture/thickness is not known but rather the opening/thickness at a single site or, at most, a few sites678.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here the overpressure (p o ) derives from the term in the brackets, and is partly due to the excess pressure p e in the source magma chamber of the dyke, and partly on the buoyancy term (ρ r − ρ m )g as defined above (note that the term is multiplied by the height or length L to get the proper units). The aperture is thus known to vary with overpressure, and can be modelled in various ways (e.g., Gudmundsson, 1986;Gray, 1992;Kusumoto et al, 2012). Currently, however, there are no available analytical models that allow the coupled changes in overpressure and aperture to be directly related to changes in volumetric flow rates during volcanic eruptions.…”
Section: Volumetric Flow Rate Through a Feeder Dykementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the magnitude of the regional tensile stress field has been estimated from the aspect (length/aperture) ratios of tension fractures in the rift zone of Iceland [Gudmundsson, 1983]. Since equation (1) is very simple and suggests a linear relation between the crack shape and the driving pressure or stress, it has also been applied to estimate the overpressure associated with observed dikes in the field, although more general solutions exist [e.g., Gudmundsson, 2011;Gudmundsson et al, 2012;Kusumoto et al, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%