1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0126(199808)46:4<269::aid-pi989>3.0.co;2-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse micro-emulsion polymerization of acrylamide in the presence of a mixture of oleophilic/hydrophilic surfactants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they could only obtain stable latices in the presence of an electrolyte (sodium acetate), and they were not able to obtain AM concentrations higher than 22% (w/w). The homopolymerization of AM in an inverse microemulsion stabilized by anionic surfactants has been more studied 18–20. In the AM–toluene–water system stabilized by bis(2‐ethylhexyl)sulfosuccinate (AOT),18, 19 the obtained molecular weights were comparable to those reported in this article, but the AM concentration in the AM microemulsion was smaller than 7% (w/w).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they could only obtain stable latices in the presence of an electrolyte (sodium acetate), and they were not able to obtain AM concentrations higher than 22% (w/w). The homopolymerization of AM in an inverse microemulsion stabilized by anionic surfactants has been more studied 18–20. In the AM–toluene–water system stabilized by bis(2‐ethylhexyl)sulfosuccinate (AOT),18, 19 the obtained molecular weights were comparable to those reported in this article, but the AM concentration in the AM microemulsion was smaller than 7% (w/w).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In the AM–toluene–water system stabilized by bis(2‐ethylhexyl)sulfosuccinate (AOT),18, 19 the obtained molecular weights were comparable to those reported in this article, but the AM concentration in the AM microemulsion was smaller than 7% (w/w). Lezovic et al20 made inverse microemulsions in toluene with higher AM concentrations (up to 22% w/w) with a mixture of AOT and sodium dodecyl sulfate as the surfactant; nevertheless, the obtained molar masses did not go beyond the 2 × 10 6 g/mol value. Finally, Yan et al21 polymerized AM in an inverse kerosene–water microemulsion stabilized by a cationic surfactant, cetyltrimethyltetraammonium bromide, and fatty alcohols as cosurfactants; they reported molar masses lower than 1.3 × 10 6 g/mol with a 10% concentration of AM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The maximal rate of inverse microemulsion copolymerization of BA and AAm increases with SDS concentration (Table 1): This behaviour favours the micellar model22 but strongly deviates from our previous results obtained for the microemulsion polymerization of AAm29 where the rate of inverse microemulsion polymerization of AAm decreased with increasing [SDS]:29 A more pronounced decrease in the rate of microemulsion polymerization of AAm with increasing concentration of AOT (the reaction order was observed to be − 0.72) was reported by Carver et al 30 The present data show that the addition of SDS increases the reaction order from − 0.72 to − 0.14.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…ref 15). It was also shown 16 that the addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) to the aqueous phase of the inverse microemulsion toluene/AOT/water/ AAm/SDS increases the value of the volume fraction of aqueous phase, Φ aw , necessary for the formation of the two-phase microemulsion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%