1997
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9884.00086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Gaussian cumulative sum control charts for location and shape

Abstract: Cumulative sum (CUSUM) control charts are very effective at detecting persisting special causes. The most common CUSUM chart assumes that the process measurement being monitored follows the normal distribution. Many industrial problems yield measures with skewed, positive distributionsÐexamples are component reliabilities, times to completion of tasks and insurance claims. Non-normal measures such as these should not be monitored using procedures based on the normal distribution. The inverse Gaussian distribut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have treated special cases in the EF CUSUM family, including Hawkins and Olwell (1997) on detecting known location and shape change in inverse gamma distribution, Hawkins and Zamba (2005) on change point detection in unknown mean and variance for normal distribution, Watkins et al (2008) used negative binomial CUSUM to study outbreaks of Ross River virus disease and compared it to Early Aberration Reporting System CUSUM algorithms, Wu et al (2008) studied large shifts in fraction non-conforming, and Lucas (1985) improved the Poisson CUSUM with fast initial response (FIR) and introduced the two-in-a-row rule to robust CUSUM. Healy (1987) discussed shift in mean and covariance for multivariate normal distribution using CUSUM, Alwan (2000) proposed transformation to normality to deal with EF CUSUM chart, Severo and Gama (2010) discussed using Kalman filter and CUSUM to detect residual mean and variance in the regression model, and Qiu and Hawkins (2001) used a rank-based CUSUM procedure to deal with multivariate measurements without normality assumption.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have treated special cases in the EF CUSUM family, including Hawkins and Olwell (1997) on detecting known location and shape change in inverse gamma distribution, Hawkins and Zamba (2005) on change point detection in unknown mean and variance for normal distribution, Watkins et al (2008) used negative binomial CUSUM to study outbreaks of Ross River virus disease and compared it to Early Aberration Reporting System CUSUM algorithms, Wu et al (2008) studied large shifts in fraction non-conforming, and Lucas (1985) improved the Poisson CUSUM with fast initial response (FIR) and introduced the two-in-a-row rule to robust CUSUM. Healy (1987) discussed shift in mean and covariance for multivariate normal distribution using CUSUM, Alwan (2000) proposed transformation to normality to deal with EF CUSUM chart, Severo and Gama (2010) discussed using Kalman filter and CUSUM to detect residual mean and variance in the regression model, and Qiu and Hawkins (2001) used a rank-based CUSUM procedure to deal with multivariate measurements without normality assumption.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approximate distribution of the weighted sum of sample variances is used in Aminzadeh (1993) to obtain the control limits of the EWMA chart for detecting shifts in the variability of the inverse Gaussian process. The CUSUM chart for monitoring changes in the variability of the IGð, Þ process when both the parameters and are known is constructed in Hawkins and Olwell, (1997) and Edgeman (1996). The CUSUM chart for monitoring process variability with unknown and does not seem to be available for the IGð, Þ process.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lead spread dimension is critical for successful soldering of an IC onto an electronic circuits board. Another strong argument for using the IGð, Þ distribution (see Hawkins and Olwell, 1997) is that the sampling distributions of the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator or uniformly minimum variance unbiased (UMVU) estimators of its parameters , and À1 are known (see Folks and Chhikara, 1978) and easy to work with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling distributions of IG location and scale parameter were easy to derive. Therefore, control charts for the parameters of IG distribution have been proposed in several articles (cf Edgeman, Edgeman, Edgeman, Hawkins and Olwell, and Sim).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%