2000
DOI: 10.1163/156856100742627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse gas chromatography investigation of the surface properties of cellulose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
40
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
10
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the s d values between the TEMPO-oxidised nanocelluloses and the enzymatic nanocellulose can partly be due to the different crystallinity of the nanocelullose samples. It has been proposed previously that more crystalline celluloses show a higher surface energy [26,27]. In particular, bacterial cellulose nanocrystals samples, possessing a high crystallinity index, showed s d values higher than 60 mJ m -2 [17,19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The differences in the s d values between the TEMPO-oxidised nanocelluloses and the enzymatic nanocellulose can partly be due to the different crystallinity of the nanocelullose samples. It has been proposed previously that more crystalline celluloses show a higher surface energy [26,27]. In particular, bacterial cellulose nanocrystals samples, possessing a high crystallinity index, showed s d values higher than 60 mJ m -2 [17,19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The dispersive component of the surface energy and the acid-base properties were assessed by IGC (Dorris and Gray 1980;Luner 1989, 1993;Felix and Gatenholm 1993a, b;Felix et al 1993Felix et al , 1994Glasser 1994, 1996;Jacob and Berg 1994;Belgacem et al 1995Belgacem et al , 1996Tshabalala 1997;Botaro and Gandini 1998;Trejo-O 0 Reilly et al 1998;Papirer et al 2000;Borges et al 2001;Peng and Zou 2007;Steele et al 2008; Riddle and Fowkes (1990), Kamdem et al (1993), Santos and Guthrie (2005) Cellulose (2013) (Belgacem et al 1995(Belgacem et al , 1996, and cellulose powder presented a c s d of 48 mJ m -2 (Tshabalala 1997). Recently, the dispersive component of the surface energy of microcrystalline celluloses was assessed by IGC at 0 and 44 % relative humidity (RH) (Steele et al 2008).…”
Section: Cellulose Analyses By Igcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that, besides the chemical composition of the cellulose surface, other factors such as crystallinity, diffusion of probes into the bulk volume and surface morphology also play an important role in the interaction between the probes and the cellulose surfaces and thus influence the IGC data (Chtourou et al 1995;Papirer et al 2000). Concerning crystallinity, it has been reported that microcrystalline cellulose shows a significantly higher c s d value at 50°C (40.9 mJ m -2 ) than that calculated by an empirical method for ''amorphous'' cellulose (28 mJ m -2 ) (Belgacem et al 1996;Papirer et al 2000). Overall, for the analysis of the effects of chemical and physical treatments on the cellulose surface (discussed below) care must be taken when considering a single value for the dispersive component of the surface energy of cellulose.…”
Section: Cellulose Analyses By Igcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This surprising observation was explained with the changes in crystal structure occurred during grinding. Grinding decreases the crystalline perfection and crystallite size, and on the less perfect crystalline surfaces the adsorption of the n-alkane probes is limited, since on a molecular scale rough surface, the retention time is shorter due to the hindered access (Papirer, Brendle, Balard, & Vergelati, 2000;Belgacem, Blayo, & Gardini, 1996). On the flat cellulose surface of a highly crystalline substrate such as flax fiber, the n-alkane probes can adopt a particular conformation, which leads to an optimal interaction between the probe and the surface, and consequently results in a longer retention time and a higher surface energy.…”
Section: Surface Energeticsmentioning
confidence: 99%