2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92038-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse-designed ultra-compact high efficiency and low crosstalk optical interconnect based on waveguide crossing and wavelength demultiplexer

Abstract: In this paper, we use the inverse design method to design an optical interconnection system composed of wavelength demultiplexer and the same direction waveguide crossing on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform. A 2.4 μm × 3.6 μm wavelength demultiplexer with an input wavelength of 1.3–1.6 μm is designed. When the target wavelength of the device is 1.4 μm, the insertion loss of the output port is − 0.93 dB, and there is − 18.4 dB crosstalk, in TE0 mode. The insertion loss of the target wavelength of 1.6 μm in T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yu et al inversely designed a waveguide crossing with good performance, but the footprint of 28.27 μm 2 was still unsatisfactory [3]. Xu et al reduced the footprint of waveguide crossing to less than 10 μm 2 using inverse design, however high insertion loss is unacceptable [4]. In comparison, the waveguide crossing designed inversely using our proposed adaptive projection method not only possesses footprint as small as 8.87 μm 2 , but also holds an ultra-low insertion loss of only 0.075 dB at 1310 nm, which is the best performance for waveguide crossing below 10 μm 2 within our knowledge.…”
Section: B Insertion Loss and Crosstalk In The S+c+l Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al inversely designed a waveguide crossing with good performance, but the footprint of 28.27 μm 2 was still unsatisfactory [3]. Xu et al reduced the footprint of waveguide crossing to less than 10 μm 2 using inverse design, however high insertion loss is unacceptable [4]. In comparison, the waveguide crossing designed inversely using our proposed adaptive projection method not only possesses footprint as small as 8.87 μm 2 , but also holds an ultra-low insertion loss of only 0.075 dB at 1310 nm, which is the best performance for waveguide crossing below 10 μm 2 within our knowledge.…”
Section: B Insertion Loss and Crosstalk In The S+c+l Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…specified footprints or structures) without manually tedious parameter adjustment works, saving massive resources. There are many reports on developments or improvements of nano-photonic devices using inverse design with various optimization algorithms [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60], but only few studies about the applications of inverse design on nonreciprocal devices [61][62][63][64], which are normally based on magneto-optical effects. In this study, we introduce several magnetic-free nonreciprocal devices that avoid use of magneto-optical materials and magnets, which are difficult to be compatible with current semiconductor integration technology.…”
Section: Inverse Design Of Nonreciprocal Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deeply etched Si waveguides are currently required in Si photonic integrated optical circuits for many applications. They are required in optical interconnections to reduce the divergence of the optical beams outside the waveguide [1]. They are also useful in reducing the optical intensity in the waveguides for the same optical power which is very important in many applications to avoid the non-linear effects like the 2 photons absorption in the Si ring resonators where the intensity stored inside the resonator is much higher than the input optical intensity [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%