2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse design of three-dimensional fiber reinforced composites with spatially-varying fiber size and orientation using multiscale topology optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various benchmark and multi-load structure problems have been studied, and it was concluded that locally varying FRC materials augment the global stiffness of the structure more than a fixed fiber volume fraction or isotropic multi-material structure. In continuation of the Kim methodology, Jung [132] proposed a 3D TO approach for designing FRC structures with spatially varying fiber fractions and orientations. Finally, a work by Boddeti et al [133] introduced a complete design to the manufacturing workflow for laminated continuous fiber-reinforced composites with variable stiffness enabled by spatially varying micro-structures.…”
Section: Materials Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various benchmark and multi-load structure problems have been studied, and it was concluded that locally varying FRC materials augment the global stiffness of the structure more than a fixed fiber volume fraction or isotropic multi-material structure. In continuation of the Kim methodology, Jung [132] proposed a 3D TO approach for designing FRC structures with spatially varying fiber fractions and orientations. Finally, a work by Boddeti et al [133] introduced a complete design to the manufacturing workflow for laminated continuous fiber-reinforced composites with variable stiffness enabled by spatially varying micro-structures.…”
Section: Materials Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Hu [2021] for a survey (called "free material optimization"). The most common approach for orientation optimization is to set density and orientation as design variables and optimize an objective such as compliance [Chu et al 2021;da Silva et al 2020;Jung et al 2022] or the Tsai-Wu failure criterion [Ma et al 2022] with a gradient-based optimizer. To address the checkerboard pattern issue (periodicity of the orientation variables), researchers usually use filtering [Andreassen et al 2011] to smooth the design variable field (e.g., through a weighted average of neighboring elements).…”
Section: Related Work 21 Fiber Orientation Optimization In 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fiber orientation tensor-based approach provides improved convexity because the rotation tensor is unused and it can be used for various applications. [19][20][21] However, the growth of the anisotropy is uncontrolled during optimization, despite the fact that it affects the optimized results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%