Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2023
DOI: 10.1364/opticaopen.22068827
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Design of Nanophotonic Devices using Dynamic Binarization

Abstract: The complexity of applications addressed with photonic integrated circuits is steadily rising and poses increasingly challenging demands on individual component functionality, performance and footprint. Inverse design methods have recently shown great promise to address these demands using fully automated design procedures that enable access to non-intuitive device layouts beyond conventional nanophotonic design concepts. Here we present a dynamic binarization method for the objective-first algorithm that lies… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also expect a higher sample-efficiency as well as improved quality of the predictions when the model is trained on device-field combinations, additionally featuring continuous rather than just discrete permittivity distributions. These structures, although not representing realizable devices, are often encountered in established inverse design routines [9] and provide additional insights, for example related to wavelength-permittivity relations. Moreover, analytical inverse design methods often rely on the calculation of adjoint fields, which the model could also be trained on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also expect a higher sample-efficiency as well as improved quality of the predictions when the model is trained on device-field combinations, additionally featuring continuous rather than just discrete permittivity distributions. These structures, although not representing realizable devices, are often encountered in established inverse design routines [9] and provide additional insights, for example related to wavelength-permittivity relations. Moreover, analytical inverse design methods often rely on the calculation of adjoint fields, which the model could also be trained on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being substantial components of photonic integrated circuits, the efficiency of these elements has great impact on the system's overall performance, for example in optical communication [25,26], optical phased arrays [27,28] or signal processing in complex chip layouts [29]. The optimization was conducted using an autonomously learning agent [30] where a splitting ratio of 90 by 10 for a wavelength of 𝜆 = 775 nm was cosen as the objective. We here consider the 100 nm tantalum-pentoxide-oninsulator platform, which has attractive properties for nonlinear and quantum photonics [2,31,32].…”
Section: Application To the Inverse Design Of An Asymmetric Powerspli...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation