1999
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/20.6.941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse correlation between p53 protein levels and DNA repair efficiency in human fibroblast strains treated with 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide: evidence that lesions other than DNA strand breaks trigger the p53 response

Abstract: Ionizing radiation-induced stabilization and the resultant transient accumulation of the p53 tumor suppressor protein is impaired in cells from ataxia telangiectasia (AT) patients, indicating a key role for ATM, the gene mutated in AT, upstream in the radiation-responsive p53 signaling pathway. Activation of this pathway is generally assumed to be triggered by DNA strand breaks produced directly following genotoxic stress or indirectly during excision repair of DNA lesions. The aim of this study was to identif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(57 reference statements)
3
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of the results presented here, we conclude that previous results determining the effects of DNA-damaging agents on end points such as de novo DNA synthesis (a measure of S-phase checkpoint; Mirzayans et al, 1995), S-phase index (a measure of G 1 /S checkpoint; Enns et al, 1999), and recovery of RNA synthesis (a measure of repair of transcription-blocking DNA lesions; Barley et al, 1998;Mirzayans et al, 1999) are not influenced by radiolabeling because these assays involve incubation of the cells with extremely low activities of [ 14 C]dThd (e.g., 0.005 mCi/ml) for 24 h followed by pulse labeling with p10 mCi/ml of [ 3 H]dThd or [ 3 H]Urd for no more than 1 h. Such radiolabeling conditions do not induce p53 (this study), and thus there is no reason to consider the results obtained by these assays compromised. Likewise, the previous results for quantifying repair DNA synthesis by in situ autoradiography are unlikely to be influenced by artefacts such as p53-dependent modulation of repair because this assay involves pulse labeling the cells with high activities of [ 3 H]dThd for 1 h or less which, in the light of our current findings (Figure 2), should have little or no impact on repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In view of the results presented here, we conclude that previous results determining the effects of DNA-damaging agents on end points such as de novo DNA synthesis (a measure of S-phase checkpoint; Mirzayans et al, 1995), S-phase index (a measure of G 1 /S checkpoint; Enns et al, 1999), and recovery of RNA synthesis (a measure of repair of transcription-blocking DNA lesions; Barley et al, 1998;Mirzayans et al, 1999) are not influenced by radiolabeling because these assays involve incubation of the cells with extremely low activities of [ 14 C]dThd (e.g., 0.005 mCi/ml) for 24 h followed by pulse labeling with p10 mCi/ml of [ 3 H]dThd or [ 3 H]Urd for no more than 1 h. Such radiolabeling conditions do not induce p53 (this study), and thus there is no reason to consider the results obtained by these assays compromised. Likewise, the previous results for quantifying repair DNA synthesis by in situ autoradiography are unlikely to be influenced by artefacts such as p53-dependent modulation of repair because this assay involves pulse labeling the cells with high activities of [ 3 H]dThd for 1 h or less which, in the light of our current findings (Figure 2), should have little or no impact on repair.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…LCL-N cells treated with 20 and 100 mM H 2 O 2 presented 6.970.5 and 21.471 g-H2AX foci, respectively, but these values were markedly reduced 1 h after recovery (Figure 1b), due to a repair activity. By contrast, no foci were seen in response to 4-NQO, a UV-mimetic compound generating base modifications and secondary SSBs, but not DSBs (Brosh et al, 1999;Mirzayans et al, 1999), thus supporting the specificity of g-H2AX for DSBs. The damaging activity of 4-NQO was confirmed by the accumulation of p53 protein (data not shown).…”
Section: Dna Ssbs and Dsbs Evaluation After Genotoxic Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The bulky DNA lesions elicited by 4NQO are known to substrate for GGR and 4NQO-DNA damage per se provokes up-regulation of p53. 37,38 The hypersensitivity of human and mouse XPA cells to killing by 4NQO may be associated with increased activity of p53, leading to augmented p53-mediated apoptosis. 37 Although 4NQO-induced NER is p53-dependent, 37,38 it remains ambiguous that the modulating effect of p53 on NER is gene-dosage-dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%