The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse Analysis of a Supported Excavation in Chicago

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the results of stiffness parameters estimated from both laboratory and field tests showed that the values from the laboratory data were significantly lower than those optimized from the field data, which could be due to the specimens used for the triaxial tests being taken from a thin wall tubes. Although sometimes parameter calibration may need to employ both laboratory test data and field measurements, the result of this study showed the applicability of using optimization algorithm like UCODE on efficiently calibrating model parameters at early stages of the project and provide a basis to achieve more reasonable predictions at the later stages ( Kim, 2018).…”
Section: Inverse Analysis Methods In Geotechnical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Comparing the results of stiffness parameters estimated from both laboratory and field tests showed that the values from the laboratory data were significantly lower than those optimized from the field data, which could be due to the specimens used for the triaxial tests being taken from a thin wall tubes. Although sometimes parameter calibration may need to employ both laboratory test data and field measurements, the result of this study showed the applicability of using optimization algorithm like UCODE on efficiently calibrating model parameters at early stages of the project and provide a basis to achieve more reasonable predictions at the later stages ( Kim, 2018).…”
Section: Inverse Analysis Methods In Geotechnical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[4][5][6] The effectiveness of inverse analysis depends on the forward calculation model, the field monitoring data, the data-interpretation approach and its associated optimization technique. 7 The available data-interpretation approaches for inverse analysis of braced excavations include the least squares method, 8 the maximum likelihood method, 9,10 the optimization methods, [11][12][13][14][15] and the Bayesian method. 4,5,16 Among these inverse analysis methods, the Bayesian method is a probabilistic method as it tends to provide all the possible solutions associated with their possibilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…including the inverse analysis is also limited because it relies on those monitoring points [1,2]. Consequently, a technique for measuring the displacements induced by excavation work in the entire range or full field is crucial for ensuring construction safety [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%