2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2006.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse agonism: from curiosity to accepted dogma, but is it clinically relevant?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now known that many if not all GPCRs, including the ␤ 2 -AR, can signal in the absence of agonist, a phenomenon known as constitutive activity (16,22). Simultaneous with this discovery of constitutive signaling was the identification of compounds termed inverse agonists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now known that many if not all GPCRs, including the ␤ 2 -AR, can signal in the absence of agonist, a phenomenon known as constitutive activity (16,22). Simultaneous with this discovery of constitutive signaling was the identification of compounds termed inverse agonists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many examples of inverse agonism are well known pharmacologically [12][13][14], this issue has largely been ignored clinically. This may be at least partly due to the dogma that, as therapeutic drugs, neutral antagonists must be better than partial or inverse agonists because they do not change the resting state existing as a "gifted harmony" and inhibit only agonist-dependent signals.…”
Section: Inverse Agonism: Why It Has Not Been Featuredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) [12][13][14]. A constitutively active mutation of a GPCR [13,19,20] is one of the representative situations that induce spontaneous GPCR activation.…”
Section: Fig 2 the Classification Of Gpcr Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ligand-independent activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), known as constitutive activity, is an established biologic phenomenon that results from the spontaneous isomerization of receptors from inactive to active states (Lefkowitz et al, 1993;Parra and Bond, 2007). The two-state model of receptor activation (Leff, 1995), which condenses the vast array of possible receptor conformations into either an active (R*) or inactive (R) form, provides the simplest conceptual framework for understanding constitutive activity and, in turn, inverse agonism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%