PsycTESTS Dataset 2018
DOI: 10.1037/t70101-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inventory of Interpersonal Problems--Italian Version

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sum of the 8 subscales provides an overall index (range 0-128), with higher scores indicating greater interpersonal problems. Previous studies (i.e., Lo Coco et al, 2018) showed that the questionnaire had good internal validity, reliability and good convergent/divergent validity. In this study, the McDonald's Omega of the total score was good (ω = .87).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sum of the 8 subscales provides an overall index (range 0-128), with higher scores indicating greater interpersonal problems. Previous studies (i.e., Lo Coco et al, 2018) showed that the questionnaire had good internal validity, reliability and good convergent/divergent validity. In this study, the McDonald's Omega of the total score was good (ω = .87).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this study, McDonald's Omega was excellent (ω = .92). (IIP-32;Horowitz et al, 1988;Lo Coco et al, 2018) is a questionnaire consisting of 32 items describing dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors that the responder identifies as "difficult to do" (i.e. behavioral inhibitions) or "doing too much" (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%