1997
DOI: 10.2307/40152671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inventing Ireland: The Literature of the Modern Nation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every colonial situation is unique and Ireland is no exception. As Kiberd (1996) points out, as a result of "the close proximity of Ireland to England . .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every colonial situation is unique and Ireland is no exception. As Kiberd (1996) points out, as a result of "the close proximity of Ireland to England . .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it enjoyed what Inglis has termed a 'moral monopoly', and Ireland in these years was a conservative and relatively monocultural nation (Inglis, 1998). It was in this context, and as part of the broader process of what Declan Kiberd has termed 'inventing Ireland' (Kiberd, 1995), that the Gardaí enjoyed considerable authority.…”
Section: An Garda Síochána and Cultural Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Likely familiar to readers of Irish Studies Review, this persistence may be due to the discipline's entanglements with Irish Studies and thus its sharing of key (and ongoing) debates and discourses with history, which has been dominated by revisionism since the 1990s, leading to many prominent literary critics to forcefully maintain the postcolonial framework against this encroaching historical recasting (see Connolly 2004). David Lloyd (1993), for example, and other contemporaries in the early-1990s such as Declan Kiberd (1996), Shakir Mustafa (1996), Luke Gibbons (1996), and those associated with the Field Day Theatre Company (see Eagleton, Jameson, and Said, 1990) agitated variously against the hegemonic "top-down elite histories" (Cleary 2022) of revisionist historiography, which sought to negate and depoliticise the "colonial" framework in favour of empiricism and so-called historical objectivity. Addressing the subject of colonialism, conversely, became paired with cultural nationalism, in a way that many literary theorists did not shirk, but nonetheless became perceived as an unpopular and unhelpful framework for understanding globalised Ireland in the emerging (neo)liberal, boom-time Republic and a tenuously Peace-time north.…”
Section: Ireland's Postcolonial Ecological Regimementioning
confidence: 99%