2011
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive predatory crayfish do not trigger inducible defences in tadpoles

Abstract: Invasive species cause deep impacts on ecosystems worldwide, contributing to the decline and extinction of indigenous species. Effective defences against native biological threats in indigenous species, whether structural or inducible, often seem inoperative against invasive species. Here, we show that tadpoles of the Iberian green frog detect chemical cues from indigenous predators (dragonfly nymphs) and respond by reducing their activity and developing an efficient defensive morphology against them (increase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every 48 h, 10 mL of water containing predator cues were added to buckets assigned to the ‘predator’ treatment, whereas buckets assigned to the ‘non-predator’ treatment received 10 mL of control water. Similar volumes of predator cues added to water are known to systematically induce antipredator behavior in amphibian larvae919293. Dragonflies were fed anuran tadpoles from a stock tank, once per day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every 48 h, 10 mL of water containing predator cues were added to buckets assigned to the ‘predator’ treatment, whereas buckets assigned to the ‘non-predator’ treatment received 10 mL of control water. Similar volumes of predator cues added to water are known to systematically induce antipredator behavior in amphibian larvae919293. Dragonflies were fed anuran tadpoles from a stock tank, once per day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Red swamp crayfish have a huge impact on aquatic systems, affecting several trophic levels as they are both primary consumers (filter-feeders and macrophyte consumers) and important predators of amphibian eggs and larvae (Geiger et al 2005;Gherardi 2007;Cruz et al 2008;Ficetola et al 2011). Because anti-predator responses critically depend upon predator cue recognition, they may fail against novel invasive species (Cox and Lima 2006;Freeman and Byers 2006;Gomez-Mestre and Díaz-Paniagua 2011). We therefore hypothesized that tadpoles would alter their diet in the presence of competitors and native predators, and to a lesser extent in the presence of non-native predators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses to cues from predators likely arise over long periods of coevolution, however (Sharma et al 2008), and we might not expect to see similar nonlethal effects in a system where the predators and prey have been in contact for a much shorter time period (decades not millennia; Polo-Cavia et al 2010;Gomez-Mestre and Díaz-Paniagua 2011). Alternatively, predators within the introduced range might elicit the same responses as do nativerange predators, especially if the local taxa in invaded communities belong to the same lineages as predators in the native range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%