2013
DOI: 10.1126/science.1226817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive Plants Have Scale-Dependent Effects on Diversity by Altering Species-Area Relationships

Abstract: Although invasive plant species often reduce diversity, they rarely cause plant extinctions. We surveyed paired invaded and uninvaded plant communities from three biomes. We reconcile the discrepancy in diversity loss from invaders by showing that invaded communities have lower local richness but steeper species accumulation with area than that of uninvaded communities, leading to proportionately fewer species loss at broader spatial scales. We show that invaders drive scale-dependent biodiversity loss through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
267
3
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(296 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
24
267
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the decline in abundance but unchanged richness of native species may reflect a reduction of dominant native species. This increase in evenness could be the result of a high-niche overlap between dominant native and non-native species, with fitness differences favouring abundant non-native species over abundant native competitors [49]. Other mechanisms, such as temporal or spatial niche partitioning, might also be at play among dominant and rare species in these two groups, and warrant further examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the decline in abundance but unchanged richness of native species may reflect a reduction of dominant native species. This increase in evenness could be the result of a high-niche overlap between dominant native and non-native species, with fitness differences favouring abundant non-native species over abundant native competitors [49]. Other mechanisms, such as temporal or spatial niche partitioning, might also be at play among dominant and rare species in these two groups, and warrant further examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key to understanding patterns of community responses to global change is correctly measuring the species pool. Indeed, recent studies have shown that patterns of diversity responses to GCDs can be altered by the area sampled alone Knight 2013, Powell et al 2013). As suggested by Chase and Knight (2013) collecting abundance data is potentially key to obtaining unbiased effect sizes of GCDs on communities, and may make researchers less prone to draw conclusions from probabilistic sampling effects.…”
Section: Integrating Rank Abundance Curves With Community Dissimilarimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider gamma diversity to be the total species pool for the experiment and thus static, and we consider alpha diversity to be the number of species in a treatment and therefore changeable over time. While studies typically find that GCDs reduce alpha diversity (Chalcraft et al 2008, Powell et al 2013, these reductions are often not drastic. For example, across 40 grassland sites, three years of NPK additions resulted on average a loss of two species (Borer et al 2014), and such minor losses are commonly found (see Zavaleta et al 2003, v www.esajournals.org Avolio et al 2014).…”
Section: Detecting the Magnitude And Predictability Of Community Chanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides affecting nearby plants, another impact of the invasion of exotic plant species is the low biodiversity in the ecosystem. 3,10 Low biodiversity causes a decline in the quality of environmental services that could be given to the surrounding environment. 11 This affects the stability of the ecosystem so the ecosystem is more susceptible to perturbations or disturbances and has more difficulty recovering quickly (low in ecosystem resilience).…”
Section: Figure 2 Attack Of Invasive Exotic Plant Species In Reclamamentioning
confidence: 99%