2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive “in the cath-lab” assessment of myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease: When does the gold standard not apply?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that acute coronary syndrome, cardiac hypertrophy, and severe aortic stenosis could attenuate the hyperemic response of the microcirculation to adenosine. 16 Accordingly, it is likely the prevalence (and possibly mechanism) of FFR/iFR discordance may be different in these selected populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been demonstrated that acute coronary syndrome, cardiac hypertrophy, and severe aortic stenosis could attenuate the hyperemic response of the microcirculation to adenosine. 16 Accordingly, it is likely the prevalence (and possibly mechanism) of FFR/iFR discordance may be different in these selected populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, its cost, availability, vasodilator need [10,61], and poor hemodynamic correlation [50,66] makes its use for physiological assessment meet the current guideline indicators in only 50% of the cases [19]. FFR importance is questioned [66] as well as hyperemia is suggested not to be essential to the correct diagnose [7]. Recent evidences affirm that the use of non-invasive techniques reaching similar results are promising to replace the invasive FFR [7].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFR importance is questioned [66] as well as hyperemia is suggested not to be essential to the correct diagnose [7]. Recent evidences affirm that the use of non-invasive techniques reaching similar results are promising to replace the invasive FFR [7].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of FFR relies on the achievement of maximal hyperemia, which is normally obtained in the catheterization laboratory with the intravenous or intracoronary administration of vasodilatatory agents, such as adenosine. The complex interplay between the stenotic valve, elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy and the associated negative remodelling of the coronary microcirculation may blunt the response to adenosine and the achievement of maximal hyperaemia [25][26][27][28][29]. These factors may theoretically reduce the reliability of FFR in AS, causing a possible underestimation of the true ischemic significance of a given coronary obstruction.…”
Section: Invasive Physiological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%