2004
DOI: 10.1128/aac.48.9.3636-3639.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae in France: Antimicrobial Resistance, Serotype, and Molecular Epidemiology Findings from a Monthly National Study in 2000 to 2002

Abstract: A study of 257 French invasive pneumococci isolated between 2000 and 2002 showed high rates of nonsusceptibility to penicillin and macrolides (50%), contrasting with a low frequency of resistance to amoxicillin or levofloxacin (<1%) and tolerance to vancomycin (0%). The genetic homogeneity of some serogroups, including serogroup 1, enhanced the risk of epidemiological changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the situation in Europe, where erm(B) dominates (7,21,29,30). There have recently been reports of pneumococci carrying a double mechanism, both erm(B) and mef(E) (3,14,28).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to the situation in Europe, where erm(B) dominates (7,21,29,30). There have recently been reports of pneumococci carrying a double mechanism, both erm(B) and mef(E) (3,14,28).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The proportion of resistant isolates ranges from 3 to 80% in different countries (2,7,20,22,23,26,33). Macrolide resistance is mediated by two main mechanisms in pneumococci: target site modification and drug efflux.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the last 10 years, macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae has emerged on a dramatic scale throughout Europe (4,16). This study shows that resistance to macrolides in Germany has drastically increased over the last 12 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The difference was more dramatic in the group of strains showing the higher levofloxacin MIC (2 g/ml), which represented 2.6% of the American sample and 12.2% in the present study: 71% (10 of 14) versus 0% (0 of 29). It could be explained by (i) the difference in the levofloxacin MIC distribution and the low frequency of high-level levofloxacin-resistant strains (0.4% versus 1.8% in the United States), (ii) the methodology (systematic screening versus sampling) and origin of the strains (bloodstream versus noninvasive strains), and (iii) the low level of levofloxacin consumption in France compared to the United States, which was significantly associated with the increasing rate of FQR in this country (2,5,8,9,12,17,20,27,30). However, these results should be confirmed with a larger number of strains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample of 236 clinical FQsusceptible strains was randomly selected from the annual survey program performed between 2000 and 2003 in 105 general hospitals as part of the Collège de Bactériologie-Virologie Hygiène des Hôpitaux (ColBVH) Study Group and screened for mutations. The MICs were determined by an agar dilution method and interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines as previously described (11,12,22,23). Two specific primers and TaqMan probes were designed to detect wildtype alleles at positions 79 and 83 of the parC QRDR of S. pneumoniae (nucleotide positions 3852 to 3854 and 3864 to 3866, respectively) ( Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%