2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive ecosystem engineers and biotic indices: Giving a wrong impression of water quality improvement?

Abstract: Abstract:Benthic component of an ecosystem is considered in ecological status assessment of the key European Directives. Most of the metrics proposed for the benthic quality assessment are biodiversity based. Their robustness and applicability are widely discussed in many recent studies. However an impact of invasive alien species on biotic indices and environmental quality assessments has been largely overlooked by researchers so far. In the current study we assessed Benthic Quality Index (BQI) in a coastal e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain aquatic invasive alien species were observed to adversely impact the Benthic Quality Index (BQI) in marine ecosystems (Zaiko and Daunys, 2015). Thus, these coastal invaders can act as ecological indicators of the marine ecosystem health.…”
Section: Ecological Indicator Perspectives Of the Iapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain aquatic invasive alien species were observed to adversely impact the Benthic Quality Index (BQI) in marine ecosystems (Zaiko and Daunys, 2015). Thus, these coastal invaders can act as ecological indicators of the marine ecosystem health.…”
Section: Ecological Indicator Perspectives Of the Iapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main aim of the developed model was to raise the awareness and demonstrate potentials of mussel farms (Figure 1). Due to the missing experience, several risks were omitted such as the interaction with other benthic species (Zaiko and Daunys, 2015) and potential species composition changes (Wolnomiejski and Witek, 2013). Applying more detailed growth models, e.g., the Dynamic Energy Budget (Saraiva et al, 2011;Thomas et al, 2011;Maar et al, 2015) may give more sophisticated results, but a broad calibration data set is then needed, which was not available for our case study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing number and expansion of IAS in freshwater ecosystems has replaced native biota in recent years, dramatically changing aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem structure and functioning (Cardoso and Free 2008) and degrading aquatic services (Mota et al 2014). Invasive species may alter the water quality (McCormick et al 2010), as in the case of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), with consequent impacts on water supply facilities and biotic indices (Minchin et al 2002, Zaiko andDaunys 2015). Moreover, surface waters can be vectors for the spread of diseases, such as sudden oak death (Grünwald et al 2012), incurring major economic and ecological costs for the control of invasive species.…”
Section: The New Environmental Challenges: Climate Change and Invasive Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%