2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive Cardiomechanics During Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Massive Tricuspid Regurgitation Using Biventricular Pressure-Volume Loop Monitoring

Abstract: Invasive pressure-volume loop analysis allows direct monitoring of changing intraventricular cardiac mechanics during structural heart interventions. Our aim was to illustrate changes in right and left ventricular mechanics during transcatheter edge-to-edge tricuspid repair for severe tricuspid regurgitation. ( Level of Difficulty: Advanced. )

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a decrease in PASP associated with replacement, however, we did not find any significant association between RV stroke volume and replacement despite the decrease in RV function. These results are consistent with pressure‐volume loop (PVL) analysis of RV mechanics pre‐ and posttricuspid T‐TEER, which demonstrated a decrease in RV ejection fraction with associated resolution of tricuspid regurgitant volume, but a stable RV SV and an actual improvement in RV stroke work and RV end‐systolic elastance, a load‐independent measure of RV function 16 . It is important to note that load‐dependent measures of RV function, including TAPSE, FAC and ejection fraction, are likely inadequate in assessing RV systolic function in the setting of significant TR, and that RV SV and its response to therapy is the more physiologically relevant parameter of RV systolic function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There was a decrease in PASP associated with replacement, however, we did not find any significant association between RV stroke volume and replacement despite the decrease in RV function. These results are consistent with pressure‐volume loop (PVL) analysis of RV mechanics pre‐ and posttricuspid T‐TEER, which demonstrated a decrease in RV ejection fraction with associated resolution of tricuspid regurgitant volume, but a stable RV SV and an actual improvement in RV stroke work and RV end‐systolic elastance, a load‐independent measure of RV function 16 . It is important to note that load‐dependent measures of RV function, including TAPSE, FAC and ejection fraction, are likely inadequate in assessing RV systolic function in the setting of significant TR, and that RV SV and its response to therapy is the more physiologically relevant parameter of RV systolic function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Conversely, tricuspid TEER may enhance left ventricular preload in response to right ventricular unloading. 9 PVL analysis provides a comprehensive, beat-to-beat visualization of cardiac and hemodynamic physiology from both load-dependent and load-independent perspectives. Insights regarding changes in cardiac mechanoenergetics, ventricular loading, and ventricular-vascular interactions surrounding endovascular structural interventions are scarce but pertinent to predict the (individual) response to changing ventricular preload or afterload conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, tricuspid TEER may enhance left ventricular preload in response to right ventricular unloading. 9 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation