2009
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive bladder cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, both the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society of Medical Oncology recommend either mvac or gc as first-line treatment in those patients 42,43 .…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, both the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society of Medical Oncology recommend either mvac or gc as first-line treatment in those patients 42,43 .…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Ambiguity in the impact and boundaries of a lymph node dissection at cystectomy likely explain the limited uptake of extended dissections (as measured by lymph node yields) in routine practice, 7 including variations in practice in higher-volume, academic centres. 8 There is consistent evidence that provider (hospital and surgeon) cystectomy volume is strongly associated with patient outcomes; [9][10][11] this evidence has led to calls for centralization of care for other complex surgical procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5]15,16 Despite this, uptake of NACT in the general population is much lower than expected for the potential pool of appropriate candidates, perhaps dramatically so for those patients in Canada. 17 The same guidelines either do not support adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), or provide only weak support, due to a lack of information from adequately powered RCTs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faute d'essais contrôlés à répartition aléatoire récents comparant systématiquement les résultats de la cystectomie radicale à ceux d'interventions moins agressives, les lignes directrices internationales sur les traitements définitifs localisés présentent des discordances [2][3][4][5][6] . L'ambiguïté qui plane sur l'incidence et les limites de la lymphadé-nectomie pendant la cystectomie explique sans doute le recours limité aux dissections élargies (mesurées selon le rendement ganglionnaire) dans la pratique courante 7 , et notamment l'écart par rapport à ce qui se fait dans les centres de santé universitaires à volume élevé 8 .…”
Section: L'auc a Pour Mandat De Promouvoir Les Plus Hautes Normes Danunclassified