2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-016-1327-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasion of the acoustic niche: variable responses by native species to invasive American bullfrog calls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
24
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, B . leptolineata is known to change call rate in response to the calls of invasive frogs, even when their calls present little spectral overlap, as well as in response to continuous white noise [ 31 ]. In sum, these results point out that adjustments in call rate are likely to be stimulus-specific, and that the triggers for that adjustment are yet to be fully explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Still, B . leptolineata is known to change call rate in response to the calls of invasive frogs, even when their calls present little spectral overlap, as well as in response to continuous white noise [ 31 ]. In sum, these results point out that adjustments in call rate are likely to be stimulus-specific, and that the triggers for that adjustment are yet to be fully explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should expect a close relationship between the degree of frequency overlap between calls and noise and the type or intensity of call modification. Indeed, species calling at frequencies within the noise spectral range will tend to be more affected [ 31 ], and therefore are more likely to have to adjust their calls towards a reduction in temporal and spectral overlap. Changes in call pattern may also be directly related to the intensity of the noise [ 14 , 32 , 33 ], as background noise can limit the distance over which an individual can perceive acoustic signals [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive species, for instance, can disturb sexual communication in native species by masking or altering their signals. For instance, the calls of the invasive American bullfrog ( Lithobates catesbeianus ) cause native Brazilian frogs to modify their calls (Both & Grant, ; Medeiros et al ., ). Similarly, the invasive cane toad ( Rhinella marina ) causes a native Australian frog ( Limnodynastes convexiusculus ) to reduce its calling (Bleach et al ., ).…”
Section: Consequences Of Altered Mate‐choice Systemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This suggests that the frequency band of L. larvaepartus can mask the frequency band of L. modestus. Based on the acoustic niches, these two frogs cannot live together in the same habitat, because the overlap in the acoustic niches disturbs the comfort zone of the other frog acoustic niches, which calls that has wide-frequency band and broad-energy spectrum can interfere the acoustic niches of other frogs species that has calls with a narrow frequency spectrum [21]. Harmonization of acoustics with minimal overlapping of frequency bands is a requirement to occupy the same microhabitat of the frog species group [22].…”
Section: Acoustic Niche Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%