2002
DOI: 10.1007/s002850100136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasion dynamics and attractor inheritance

Abstract: We study the dynamics of a population of residents that is being invaded by an initially rare mutant. We show that under relatively mild conditions the sum of the mutant and resident population sizes stays arbitrarily close to the initial attractor of the monomorphic resident population whenever the mutant has a strategy sufficiently similar to that of the resident. For stochastic systems we show that the probability density of the sum of the mutant and resident population sizes stays arbitrarily close to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
130
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biological interpretation of this inequality is clear: the mutant's effective birth rate has to exceed the dilution rate. After successful invasion, the mutant generally replaces the resident (Geritz et al 2002); around evolutionary branching points they can coexist, leading to a dimorphic predator population (Metz et al 1992(Metz et al , 1996Geritz et al 1997Geritz et al , 1998.…”
Section: Appendix: Derivation Of Invasion Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biological interpretation of this inequality is clear: the mutant's effective birth rate has to exceed the dilution rate. After successful invasion, the mutant generally replaces the resident (Geritz et al 2002); around evolutionary branching points they can coexist, leading to a dimorphic predator population (Metz et al 1992(Metz et al , 1996Geritz et al 1997Geritz et al , 1998.…”
Section: Appendix: Derivation Of Invasion Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has led to the discovery of shifting evolutionary isoclines and the slowing down of the evolutionary path). Another approach is the use of pairwise resident-invader contests [23,22,21]. It has lead to many interesting insights regarding evolutionary branching, evolutionarily singular strategies, and the "inheritance" of a resident's attractor by a mutant invader [23,22,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replacing v by the strategy u ij results in the fitness function for individuals of type ij. We note that one does not have to use the G−function approach to study strategy dynamics and a fitness-function based formalism can also be pursued [2,1,14,23,22,21]. In the following, we shall replace H ij (ũ,z)…”
Section: The Per-phenotype G−functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B). In case of positive invasion fitness, the mutant generically replaces the resident (Geritz et al 2002) and the resident population's trait value shifts accordingly. This directional selection on the trait of a monomorphic resident population persists as long as the selection gradient…”
Section: Evolutionary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%