2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasion and effective size of graph-structured populations

Abstract: Population structure can strongly affect evolutionary dynamics. The most general way to describe population structures are graphs. An important observable on evolutionary graphs is the probability that a novel mutation spreads through the entire population. But what drives this spread of a mutation towards fixation? Here, we propose a novel way to understand the forces driving fixation by borrowing techniques from evolutionary demography to quantify the invasion fitness and the effective population size for di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Driven by the ubiquity of heterogeneity within populations, there has been growing interest in understanding how it affects selection in simple mathematical models. Much of this work, ranging from earlier models in population genetics [24][25][26][27] to those with more fine-grained spatial structure [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], is summarized in a prequel to this study [36] (which deals with well-mixed dispersal structures and spatially-modulated fitness). However, a general understanding of the effects of heterogeneous resource distributions within structured populations is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driven by the ubiquity of heterogeneity within populations, there has been growing interest in understanding how it affects selection in simple mathematical models. Much of this work, ranging from earlier models in population genetics [24][25][26][27] to those with more fine-grained spatial structure [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], is summarized in a prequel to this study [36] (which deals with well-mixed dispersal structures and spatially-modulated fitness). However, a general understanding of the effects of heterogeneous resource distributions within structured populations is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the probability that an initial subset of mutants takes over the population, and is a popular measure to compare different strategies within evolutionary theory (Altrock and Traulsen 2009 ; Broom and Rychtář 2008 ; Czuppon and Traulsen 2018 ; Giaimo et al. 2018 ; Lieberman et al. 2005 ; Traulsen and Hauert 2010 ).…”
Section: The Effect Of Fitness Variation On Bet-hedger Selection Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 26 ] provided a mathematical treatment using coalescence times for graph structures under weak selection. Other work has examined the type of graph structures that lead to amplification of selection [ 27 ], the properties of fixation probability and time for the Moran process [ 10 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 28 ], mathematical models for fixation time for specific k-partite graphs [ 29 ] and approaches to approximate the fixation probability for neutral drift models [ 30 ]. This field of research has emphasized game-theoretic models for behaviour, or used a two-allele haploid model based on the Moran process, with the emphasis on how the evolution of cooperation or fixation of a mutant is altered by population structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that these models all use a single population with overlapping generations, normally replacing just one (or occasionally, two) individuals per time step (described as a steady-state model [ 32 ]). The generational model, mainly used in evolutionary biology and specifically in the HR model [ 16 ], replaces an entire population each generation. In the electronic supplementary material, we show that this distinction is crucial in terms of how spatial structure affects both fixation probability and time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%