1997
DOI: 10.1006/aima.1997.1601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant Valuations on Star-Shaped Sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the dual Brunn-Minkowski theory, Klain gave a classification of continuous, rotation invariant valuations on star-shaped sets [11,12]. In particular, for continuous valuations invariant with respect to the special linear group SLðdÞ; i.e., the group of linear transformations with determinant 1, he showed that the only examples are linear combinations of the Euler characteristic and volume.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the dual Brunn-Minkowski theory, Klain gave a classification of continuous, rotation invariant valuations on star-shaped sets [11,12]. In particular, for continuous valuations invariant with respect to the special linear group SLðdÞ; i.e., the group of linear transformations with determinant 1, he showed that the only examples are linear combinations of the Euler characteristic and volume.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the dual Brunn-Minkowski theory, Klain gave a classification of continuous, rotation invariant valuations on star-shaped sets [11], [12]. In particular, for continuous valuations invariant with respect to the special linear group SL(d), i.e., the group of linear transformations with determinant 1, he showed that the only examples are linear combinations of the Euler characteristic and volume.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to, on the one hand, rapid progress in core affine areas directly linked to the very structure of convex bodies, like the L p Brunn Minkowski theory (e.g., [2,5,7,8,11], [18]- [26], [30,35,36,38,39]) and the theory of valuations [10], [12], [13], [15]- [17], [32,33]. On the other hand, even questions that had been considered Euclidean in nature turned out to be affine problems-among them the famous Busemann-Petty Problem (finally laid to rest in [3,6,41,42]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%