2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11253-007-0005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant tori of locally Hamiltonian systems close to conditionally integrable systems

Abstract: We study the problem of perturbations of quasiperiodic motions in the class of locally Hamiltonian systems. By using methods of the KAM-theory, we prove a theorem on the existence of invariant tori of locally Hamiltonian systems close to conditionally integrable systems. On the basis of this theorem, we investigate the bifurcation of a Cantor set of invariant tori in the case where a Liouville-integrable system is perturbed by a locally Hamiltonian vector field and, simultaneously, the symplectic structure of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In KAM theory, there are also results for some "exotic" classes of dynamical systems, for instance, for weakly reversible systems (where the reversing diffeomorphism of the phase space is not assumed to be an involution) [4,30], for locally Hamiltonian vector fields V (defined by the condition that the 1-form i V ω 2 is closed but not necessarily exact, so that the Hamilton function can be multi-valued) [25,26,39], for conformally Hamiltonian vector fields V (defined by the identity d(i V ω 2 ) ≡ ηω 2 with constant η = 0) [12], for generalized Hamiltonian (or Poisson-Hamilton) systems defined on Poisson manifolds [23,24] (see [11,39] for more references), for presymplectic systems (defined in another way on Poisson manifolds where the role of the symplectic form ω 2 is played by a closed degenerate 2-form with constant rank) [1], for b-Hamiltonian vector fields on the so-called b-Poisson (or log-symplectic) manifolds [18], or for equivariant vector fields [45]. Here i V ω 2 is the interior product, or the contraction, of ω 2 with V .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In KAM theory, there are also results for some "exotic" classes of dynamical systems, for instance, for weakly reversible systems (where the reversing diffeomorphism of the phase space is not assumed to be an involution) [4,30], for locally Hamiltonian vector fields V (defined by the condition that the 1-form i V ω 2 is closed but not necessarily exact, so that the Hamilton function can be multi-valued) [25,26,39], for conformally Hamiltonian vector fields V (defined by the identity d(i V ω 2 ) ≡ ηω 2 with constant η = 0) [12], for generalized Hamiltonian (or Poisson-Hamilton) systems defined on Poisson manifolds [23,24] (see [11,39] for more references), for presymplectic systems (defined in another way on Poisson manifolds where the role of the symplectic form ω 2 is played by a closed degenerate 2-form with constant rank) [1], for b-Hamiltonian vector fields on the so-called b-Poisson (or log-symplectic) manifolds [18], or for equivariant vector fields [45]. Here i V ω 2 is the interior product, or the contraction, of ω 2 with V .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herman's method has been used in KAM theory in many other situations. For instance, it was applied to coisotropic [20,25,26] and atropic [26] invariant tori of Hamiltonian [20] and locally Hamiltonian [25,26] systems. In [19,46,47,49], Herman's approach was employed in the case of systems with weak nondegeneracy conditions formulated in terms of the Brouwer topological degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also shown to hold for coisotropic tori (m < n, q = 0) in Hamiltonian systems in [33] and in locally Hamiltonian systems in [41]. The paper [43] contains some assertions concerning the atropic context (m < n, q > 0) in the very particular case of a constant matrix F in (1). In all these works, the (locally) Hamiltonian vector fields in question and their dependence on µ are assumed to be analytic while the Cantor families of perturbed invariant tori are proven to be C ∞ in the sense of Whitney (see however the note [64] presenting a general approach to Gevrey-smoothness of families of perturbed invariant tori).…”
Section: (I µ) → (ω(I µ) α(I µ) β(I µ))mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Coisotropic invariant tori of locally Hamiltonian systems are treated as a subject of KAM theory in [41-43, 50, 51]. Atropic invariant tori of Hamiltonian systems are studied from the KAM viewpoint in [29,30] (see also a discussion in [14,59]) and those of locally Hamiltonian systems in [43]. The atropic context (m < n, q > 0) is to the coisotropic one (m < n, q = 0) as the isotropic context (m = n, q > 0) is to the Lagrangian one (m = n, q = 0).…”
Section: Conjecture 1 Assume That the Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation