1970
DOI: 10.1016/0001-8708(70)90015-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant theory, old and new

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
3

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
93
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[6,12]). In the case dim X < ∞, block-invariant polynomials were investigated in the classical theory of invariants [5,11]. (|x k | + |y k |) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,12]). In the case dim X < ∞, block-invariant polynomials were investigated in the classical theory of invariants [5,11]. (|x k | + |y k |) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we give a series of statements which are straightforward generalizations of statements used in Nagata's proof of the above theorem. Their commutative version can be found for example in [4,Chapter 3]. We assume that R is a finitely generated (not necessarily commutative or unitary) K-algebra and G acts on R in such a way that the conditions (i) and (ii) hold.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nagata (see [4,Chapter 3]) found a fundamental condition assuring the finite generation of K[V ] G . This condition applies to a large class of group actions, including all rational representations of reductive linear algebraic groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for all x, y E V, and where / denotes the identity transformation of V. p is a %(«)-concomitant [3]. Further we define a second %(n)-concomitant p* which, together with p and J, suffices to write down all %(n)-concomitants of 61(F) in A2(F) following the methods of [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%