1977
DOI: 10.1216/rmj-1977-7-3-557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant sets and the hokohara-kneser property for systems of parabolic partial differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the fact that this is a classical topic, investigated by several authors (we may quote, among others, Prodi [28], Kolesov [21], Matano [24,25], and Dancer and Hess [7,8]), we feel that the result we are going to present has some interest because, unlike other (even recent) papers, we require here rather weak regularity conditions both on the coefficients of the equation and on the nonlinearity appearing in problem (8), which do not imply either the uniqueness of solutions for the initial value problem, or the validity of comparison principles of Nagumo Westphal type. The property expressed in Theorem 3.3 below is a form of relative attractivity and is somehow related to the notion of relative stability as introduced by Bellman in [5] and to that of weak positive invariance as defined by Bebernes and Schmitt in [4]. A more complete discussion of this and other related stability questions can be found in [12].…”
Section: A Stability Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the fact that this is a classical topic, investigated by several authors (we may quote, among others, Prodi [28], Kolesov [21], Matano [24,25], and Dancer and Hess [7,8]), we feel that the result we are going to present has some interest because, unlike other (even recent) papers, we require here rather weak regularity conditions both on the coefficients of the equation and on the nonlinearity appearing in problem (8), which do not imply either the uniqueness of solutions for the initial value problem, or the validity of comparison principles of Nagumo Westphal type. The property expressed in Theorem 3.3 below is a form of relative attractivity and is somehow related to the notion of relative stability as introduced by Bellman in [5] and to that of weak positive invariance as defined by Bebernes and Schmitt in [4]. A more complete discussion of this and other related stability questions can be found in [12].…”
Section: A Stability Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus have, inductively, obtained a sequence of solutions {m,}°°=1 of (1), (2) such that a(x, t) < ux(x, t) < ■ ■ ■ < u,(x, t) < • • • < ß (x, t), (x, t) E ttt. Arguments similar to those used in the proof of Theorem 2 of [3] show that the sequence {u,}°t, will converge to a solution m of (1), (2). Furthermore it is clear that , tN), for all v G £ and N -1, 2,.…”
Section: M-»oomentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Remark. It follows from Theorem 7 of [3] that the set of solutions u of (1), (2) with wmin(x, t) < u(x, t) < umsa(x, t), (x, t) G 77r, is a continuum in C"(«T).…”
Section: M-»oomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [5], [6], we give sufficient conditions in order that certain convex sets be invarian t for solutions of initial boundary value problems. We also study connectedness properties of the solution set and obtain maximal and minimal solutions of such problems.…”
Section: !~E CL R I T Y Cla Ss I Fi Cat I O N Of Ti4 T~ Page(w Li Mimentioning
confidence: 99%