“…We thus have, inductively, obtained a sequence of solutions {m,}°°=1 of (1), (2) such that a(x, t) < ux(x, t) < ■ ■ ■ < u,(x, t) < • • • < ß (x, t), (x, t) E ttt. Arguments similar to those used in the proof of Theorem 2 of [3] show that the sequence {u,}°t, will converge to a solution m of (1), (2). Furthermore it is clear that , tN), for all v G £ and N -1, 2,.…”