Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2000.906150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant image object recognition using mixture densities

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the results of the proposed method in comparison with other techniques [10]. Using a thresholding distance to avoid great differences between the distances of two image pixels, the classification error rate of the proposed local feature approach was reduced from ½¼ ± to ±.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 shows the results of the proposed method in comparison with other techniques [10]. Using a thresholding distance to avoid great differences between the distances of two image pixels, the classification error rate of the proposed local feature approach was reduced from ½¼ ± to ±.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a thresholding distance to avoid great differences between the distances of two image pixels, the classification error rate of the proposed local feature approach was reduced from ½¼ ± to ±. The same technique reduced the error rate of the approach based on distorted tangent distance from ½¼ ± to ¼± [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall result is then obtained by combining the individual results using the sum rule. An in depth discussion of this method can be found in [8].…”
Section: ô´ üµ Argmaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ô´µÔ´Ü µ (8) That is we maximize the a posteriori probability for class given an image Ü where the class conditional probability Ô´Ü µ is modeled by…”
Section: ô´ üµ Argmaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the distance is the minimum distance between one of the points and the tangent subspace of the other point, see figure 4.2. This is known as the single sided tangent distance [Dahmen et al, 2001;Keysers et al, 2004], and for clarity the original tangent distance is sometimes referred to as double sided. In the context of a classification task, the tangent subspace can be either of the reference vector (from the classification model) or the observation vector, consequently the two single sided tangent distances can be easily distinguished as the reference single sided tangent distance (RTD) and the observation single sided tangent distance (OTD) respectively.…”
Section: Tangent Distancementioning
confidence: 99%