2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2012.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant adjacency matrices of configuration graphs

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point it seems appropriate to remark that Abreu, Funk, Labbate, and Napolitano [1] recently generalized the (strongly regular) Moore graphs with girth 5 by considering the equation ((k − 1)I + J − A 2 ) m = A. This is however a quite different equation in terms of A, I, and J than the one we are considering.…”
Section: The Definition and Some Basic Observationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At this point it seems appropriate to remark that Abreu, Funk, Labbate, and Napolitano [1] recently generalized the (strongly regular) Moore graphs with girth 5 by considering the equation ((k − 1)I + J − A 2 ) m = A. This is however a quite different equation in terms of A, I, and J than the one we are considering.…”
Section: The Definition and Some Basic Observationsmentioning
confidence: 88%