1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00532611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariance principles for dependent variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, McLeish [6,8] studied the invariance principles for mixingales. Yin [9] generalized McLeish's concept of mixingales to operator-valued mixingales, and proved the operator-valued mixingale convergence theorems.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, McLeish [6,8] studied the invariance principles for mixingales. Yin [9] generalized McLeish's concept of mixingales to operator-valued mixingales, and proved the operator-valued mixingale convergence theorems.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is implied with summability conditions such as [6,7]). (1.6), and (1.9) are satisfied with the above λ and each…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard central limit theorem is for (2) ,(,)-{i ", 0<f <1, otherwise, and is often proved under a number of possible strong mixing conditions (see [4] and [5]). Suppose that the process X(t) has an absolutely continuous spectral distribution function F with spectral density /.…”
Section: ) A(t) = J X(t)g(t/t)dtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let X(t), -x <f <°°, be a strictly stationary real-valued separable random process with EX(t) = 0 and EX(t) 4 <*>. Our interest is in limit theorems for (…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The left-hand inequality of (3.9) is easy to see (cf. [12,Lemma B.2]) and the right-hand inequality follows from Lemma 3.5 of [17]. For a stochastic process Y , the correspondingα-mixing coefficient is defined as…”
Section: Definition 32 ([7]) For a Processmentioning
confidence: 99%