The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-006-0072-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariance and efficiency of convex representations

Abstract: We consider two notions for the representations of convex cones: G-representation and lifted-G-representation. The former represents a convex cone as a slice of another; the latter allows in addition, the usage of auxiliary variables in the representation. We first study the basic properties of these representations. We show that some basic properties of convex cones are invariant under one notion of representation but not the other. In particular, we prove that lifted-G-representation is closed under duality … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our tests show that the approach based on a quadratic formulation is better conditioned and more efficient that the approach based on a linearization. These tests confirm the theoretical results on the conditioning of different barriers, (Güler and Tunçel 1998;Chua and Tunçel 2008).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our tests show that the approach based on a quadratic formulation is better conditioned and more efficient that the approach based on a linearization. These tests confirm the theoretical results on the conditioning of different barriers, (Güler and Tunçel 1998;Chua and Tunçel 2008).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These tests provide empirical evidence for the theoretical comparison results on different barriers given in Güler and Tunçel (1998), Chua and Tunçel (2008). The results in these references show that the central path is distorted due to the I in the linear formulation constraint.…”
Section: Two Methods For Solving Snlmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These tests provide empirical evidence for the theoretical comparison results on different barriers given in [15,9]. The results in these references show that the central path is distorted due to the I in the linear formulation constraint.…”
Section: Measure 1: Objective Function With Different Anchorsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…These classes of sets have quite different properties in general. We refer the reader to the paper [8] for more details.…”
Section: {0}∪vmentioning
confidence: 99%